forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: homegchiche@yahoo.fr
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Vacancy formation energy
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:57:09 +0200
Dear Steven Homolya and all abinit users,
Tahanks for your last answers and your help.
this is my input file to one Vacancy in 2x2x2 fcc nickel :
# 8- atom cell : Nickel with one vacancy. Unrelaxed
strprecon 0.1
tsmear 0.01
ixc 1
acell 3*13.3
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
occopt 7
nband 48
#optcell 1
#ionmov 3
ntime 1000
#dilatmx 1.05
#ecutsm 0.5
#nsppol 2
ntype 1
zatnum 28
natom 8
type 8*1
xcart
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.5 0.0
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.0 0.5 0.5
1.0 1.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 1.0
1.0 0.5 0.5
1.0 0.0 0.0
vacnum 1
vaclst 1
ecut 55.0
2#Definition of the k-point grid
kptopt 1
ngkpt 8 8 8
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.5
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 80
toldfe 1.0d-
-----------------------------------
And this my input file for pur nickel substanse :
occopt 7
tsmear 0.01
ixc 1
acell 3*6.65
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
#nsppol 2
#occopt 3
nband 9
#spinat 0.0 0.0 0.5
optcell 1
ionmov 3
ntime 1000
dilatmx 1.05
ecutsm 0.5
ntype 1
zatnum 28
ndtset 1
natom 1
type 1
xred
0.0 0.0 0.0
ecut 55.0
kptopt 1
ngkpt 8 8 8
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.5
nstep 80
toldfe 1.0d-6
-------------------------------
my question is if this two intput files are compatible to calculate the
formation energy ?.
Thanks for your time and your help
Sincerly yours
Megchiche
- Vacancy formation energy, homegchiche, 10/20/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Vacancy formation energy, Steven Homolya, 10/21/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Vacancy formation energy, homegchiche, 10/21/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Vacancy formation energy, Steven Homolya, 10/22/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.