Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: cgwf: converged with tan2th

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: cgwf: converged with tan2th


Chronological Thread 
  • From: mmikami@rc.m-kagaku.co.jp
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: cgwf: converged with tan2th
  • Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:18:13 +0100

Hi,

I cannot graps how it failed, but my guess (question) is:
the simple, non-spin-polarized LDA computation with the default occopt(=1)
will give a solution of a (narrow-gap) semiconductor for "FeGe" ?? (Since the
FeSi has such a narrow gap (0.1 eV in LDA calculation), the simple LDA
compuation of FeGe may lead to metallic solution. You might want to try
literature survey before your own calculations.)

I guess that LDA with metallic occupancy (occopt = 3 or 4 or ... or 7 & set
tsmear) may give a convergence somehow. But it should be noted that the
converged solution may not be the REAL ground state for such a (possible
strong-correlated) sysytem.
But it would be still helpful to understand what is going on in the
approximation that you employ.

It may also be mentioned (as a general remark) that the internal
coordinations ("xred") should be fully optimized before running optcel(>0)
job. In my cases, I often use two datasets for such purpose; the first
dataset with only ionmov = 2 or 3, then the second dataset with optcel(>0) &
ionmov(=2 or3) & the xred's optimized in the 1st dataset.

Good luck,
Masayoshi



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page