forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:03:51 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Qk8QPTJMujEs9G80sSgUYQJv8n5pyxHMwa1XQBONb45F13IehGSkfT5i4MJEe/5o/LJYmIJ8hi+PwtaYg0/g3NUbV5Ni6Furlze4wLWd8/zLg61Raemhtz6ezKuh8yybo4bSLdrHULVGObHQ0MdLH1VtMCVmWIjOL+OUoaEGzkg=
Hi John,
I'm not sure about the following answer but :
1) are you sure your computation is converged in term of
-ecut (looks very small for something with O and V)
-kpt (looks to much homogeneous for your cell)
-number of bands
2) are you sure that your scf cycles are converging during your
geometry optimisation ?
3) are you sure your large forces are not coming from the fact you
have fixed some coordinates in your cell ? Doing this will probably
make abinit consider the forces on the fixed atoms along the fixed
axis as zero. Don't you think so ? Can't it be the reasons of your
problem ?
Best regards
PMA
On 10/27/06, john Bob <bobjohn.lzu@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Abinit Users:
I have done the acell optimization,and it was converged.But
when I use the converged acell to do another scf calculation ,I find
the cartesian force is much larger than the converged tolmxf.
Is anything wrong with my configure file ,what's the
difference between the two cartesian forces?
Any advise is appreciated.
=======================================
v2o5.in:
acell 21.75453 6.73498 8.25432
rprim
1.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 1.000000
#Definition of the atom types
# 14 kind of atoms
# ['O', 'V']
ntypat 2
znucl 8 23
#Definition of tha atoms
natom 14
typat 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
xred
1.1769520088E-01 2.5000000000E-01 4.5665597737E-01
3.8230479912E-01 2.5000000000E-01 4.5665597737E-01
8.8230479912E-01 7.5000000000E-01 5.4334402263E-01
.....
natfixy 14
iatfixy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
# Kpoints
kptopt 1
#ngkpt 4 4 4
ngkpt 3 3 3
getwfk -1
ecut 10
nstep 100
toldfe 1.0d-6
diemac 8.0
optcell 1
tolmxf 1.0d-4
ionmov 3
ntime 100
dilatmx 1.1
ecutsm 0.5
#Use GGA functional
ixc 11
===========================================================
SCF.in
acell 2.1951881203E+01 6.7960779141E+00 8.3292009550E+00 Bohr
rprim
1.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 1.000000
#Definition of the atom types
# 14 kind of atoms
# ['O', 'V']
ntypat 2
znucl 8 23
#Definition of tha atoms
natom 14
typat 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
xred 1.1289399161E-01 2.5000000000E-01 4.6076081641E-01
3.8710600839E-01 2.5000000000E-01 4.6076081641E-01
8.8710600839E-01 7.5000000000E-01 5.3923918359E-01
...
# Kpoints
kptopt 1
ngkpt 3 3 3
ecut 10
nstep 100
toldfe 1.0d-6
#toldff 1.0d-6
diemac 8.0
#Use GGA functional
ixc 11
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- SCF problem after Acell optimization, john Bob, 10/27/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 10/28/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, john Bob, 10/28/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 10/28/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, john Bob, 10/28/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 10/28/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, john Bob, 10/28/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, Konstantin Rushchanskii, 10/30/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 10/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.