Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] SCF problem after Acell optimization
  • Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:48:53 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KmuMtDahGO9TYnJjF8LRJh4/KWvBSQMYYEC6QzU0t4cC3GOXtZwLDH/Ol7GiaZdh3OGiAuHXjA2cGevvBbsCXic+wl7SfyxjtTj+WMvP/+xR5FBIzZr62Qxc2Fl7Enbyu1Ws1dVOE/yZWPoEeq3QTz2IutNNWXNS6WThqouaxIc=

Hi,

I include my comments between your lines below :

On 10/28/06, john Bob <bobjohn.lzu@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Anglade:
I have not done the ecut converge test yet.I want to do it after
optimization.
Nice idea but you must be carefull with that : You might still want to
have at least the kpt mesh converge as well as the ecut. For instance
starting with convergence to 10^-2 hartree for each and optimising the
forces down to 10^-3 then 10^-3 for kpt and ecut and 10^-4 for
forces...

A good idea if you want to start with rough low-cost calculations is
to had a large electronic temperatur wich will help k-point
convergency (tsmear+occopt).

I also don't know how to create the kpoints for the
orthorhombic v2o5,so i use the homogeneous sets.

I'm also not a master at reciprocal space 3D visualisation. That's why
I use the "kptrlen" + "prtkpt" (see the doc) to do an automatic
optimization. Try it ; your gonna love it.

the number of bands
is 42,
Looks good from your output. But if you use electronic temperature
don't forget to increase it.

GGA pesuedopotential used comes from the abinit,org website.
The optimization ended after about 14 steps and converged.Below
attachment is the .out file
A problem is that it is not really converged: you convergence
criterion on total energy is not strong enough. It might be better to
use toldff about 2 order of magnitude below tolmxf.


In SCF calculation ,there is no fix in y axes.I think the fixy
in the optimization step configure file is not so important because
from the scf calculation I can see the froce in the y axes are all
zero .Am i right?
NO
they are set to zero so that the atoms stay unmoved along this axis. I
think that this is the main source of your problem.

Also
I am going to do the optimization without the 'fixy'.
the attached file: first is the result of optimization second is
the configure file of the optimization ,third is the scf configure
file.

A last advice: instead of diemac use "iprcel 4X" It is superior by a
wide margin.


Best regards





--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page