Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - geometry optimization

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

geometry optimization


Chronological Thread 
  • From: xd0533@163.com
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: geometry optimization
  • Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:09:07 +0200

dear users;
I have done YTaO4 acell geometry optimization for a long time.But,the
result is in worse agreement with experimental result.I use TM
pseudopotentials(LDA).First,I use optcell=0,ionmov=2 to modify nuclear
positions. I get xred in outfile.Next,I use optcell=2,ionmov=2 to optimize
acell,and I use xred of just getting as inputfile.The inputfile is as
follows:
optcell 2
ionmov 2
ntime 100
ecutsm 0.5
tolmxf 5.0d-4
dilatmx 1.2
#Definition of the k-point grids
kptopt 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5 # These shifts will be the same for all grids
ngkpt 4 4 4
#Definition of the unit cell
acell 9.6584 10.01177 10.3009
angdeg 90 96.45 90
#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 3
znucl 39 73 8
#Definition of the atoms
natom 12
typat 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 2
xred
4.8058571790E-01 4.5320614056E-01 2.7776829847E-01
4.1012786695E-02 2.1174718305E-02 2.8105369766E-01
1.9414282096E-02 4.5320614056E-01 -2.7776829847E-01
4.5898721331E-01 2.1174718305E-02 -2.8105369766E-01
-4.8058571790E-01 -4.5320614056E-01 -2.7776829847E-01
-4.1012786695E-02 -2.1174718305E-02 -2.8105369766E-01
9.8058571790E-01 -4.5320614056E-01 2.7776829847E-01
5.4101278669E-01 -2.1174718305E-02 2.8105369766E-01
2.5000000000E-01 7.5235062898E-01 0.0000000000E+00
-2.5000000000E-01 -7.5235062898E-01 0.0000000000E+00
2.5000000000E-01 2.6379213798E-01 5.0000000000E-01
-2.5000000000E-01 -2.6379213798E-01 -5.0000000000E-01

#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 35 # I have done ecut convergence
iscf 7
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 100
toldfe 1.0d-5
diemac 4.0
Part of the outfile is as follows:
Unit cell characteristics :
acell= 1.0692565368E+01 1.1095588474E+01 1.0450404672E+01
rprim= 9.9999998815E-01 3.2833604208E-31 -1.5393834796E-04
6.1165109454E-17 1.0000000000E+00 -9.4156560137E-21
-1.2275216148E-01 7.4401911073E-17 9.9243735664E-01
ucvol= 1.2304392936E+03 Bohr^3
lengths= 1.0692565368E+01 1.1095588474E+01 1.0450404672E+01 Bohr
angles (23,13,12)= 90.00000000 97.05978442 90.00000000 degrees
Cartesian coordinates (bohr)
4.96161331301609E+00 4.89728383032503E+00 2.88622266538181E+00
8.69344139096630E-01 9.81409686207247E-01 2.66179615315217E+00
3.84669307684909E-01 4.89728383032503E+00 -2.88704566330592E+00
4.47693848160436E+00 9.81409686207247E-01 -2.66261915107627E+00
-4.96161331301609E+00 -4.89728383032503E+00 -2.88622266538181E+00
-8.69344139096631E-01 -9.81409686207247E-01 -2.66179615315217E+00
1.03078959337171E+01 -4.89728383032503E+00 2.88539966745771E+00
6.21562675979762E+00 -9.81409686207247E-01 2.66097315522806E+00
2.67314131035050E+00 8.49957215291789E+00 -4.11498962053044E-04
-2.67314131035050E+00 -8.49957215291789E+00 4.11498962053044E-04
2.03173642946528E+00 3.48704012503686E+00 5.18527449508898E+00
-2.03173642946528E+00 -3.48704012503686E+00 -5.18527449508898E+00
Cartesian forces (hart/bohr); max,rms= 1.94597E-04 1.02190E-04 (free atoms)
1.50867868418697E-04 -7.85867827454533E-05 -1.94597458622266E-04
-3.79472729527827E-05 -5.94519272983165E-05 -9.00750494845077E-05
-1.50867868418697E-04 -7.85867827454533E-05 1.94597458622266E-04
3.79472729527827E-05 -5.94519272983165E-05 9.00750494845077E-05
-1.50867868418697E-04 7.85867827454533E-05 1.94597458622266E-04
3.79472729527827E-05 5.94519272983165E-05 9.00750494845077E-05
1.50867868418697E-04 7.85867827454533E-05 -1.94597458622266E-04
-3.79472729527827E-05 5.94519272983165E-05 -9.00750494845077E-05
-1.44474277913111E-21 1.61519413253319E-04 -1.07652663224442E-20
-1.44101465119555E-21 -1.61519413253319E-04 1.34530518594998E-20
-1.44340705672755E-21 4.57803063226851E-05 -2.08827059393681E-21
-1.44235037359911E-21 -4.57803063226851E-05 4.77605613099245E-21
At the end of Broyden step 32, total energy= -1.50239164326113E+02 Ha.
At Broyd/MD step 32, gradients are converged :
max grad (force/stress)=1.9460E-04<tolmxf=5.0000E-04 ha/bohr (free atoms)

The question is the acell I get is larger than experimental result.Many
articles refer that the result of LDA is smaller(5%) than experimental
result.And the error is so largre.I change xc,but there is no effect.Also I
did ecut convergence.I doubt that the pseudopotentials are not
suitable.Whether I need to generate pseudopotentials myself? I am puzzled for
a long time.Can you help me?Thank you in advance.
Best wishes!
xiang



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page