forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "D. R. Hamann" <drhamann@mat-simresearch.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:55:30 -0400
Dear Zhang,
In general, if you have negative diagonal elements in your elastic tensor, it indicates that you have an unstable structure which would also be indicated by negative gamma-point phonon frequencies in your RF-run output. The relatively small negative acoustic-mode eigenvalue flagged in the anaddb warning shouldn't cause major problems like this. Getting very different results from two runs of the same data is very strange, and indicates that some quantities are poorly converged, with the errors perhaps magnified when anaddb takes the pseudo-inverse of a nearly-singular dynamical matrix to calculate the relaxed-atom elastic tensor.
Beyond this, I'm not sure I understand your input data or if this relates to your recent posts on Al2O3. This looks like an N4O8 unit cell, in which case nband is wrong. If this is supposed to be an (NO2)4 molecular crystal, these are notoriously hard to structurally optimize because you have very stiff covalent bonds and very soft van der Waals bonds (which are poorly described by LDA anyway).
Don Hamann
waigen zhang wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply for my last question.
Another problem is that I am getting some results(elastic constant) case sensitive for my material.I used the same structural geometry and same ecut,ngkpt,psp...,but each time the outcomes of elastic constants are quite different.BTW,I did the structural optimization and the optimized structure seems no problem before any calculation.
I notice that there is a warning in the output file
elast9 : WARNING - :
Acoustic sum rule violation met : the eigenvalues of accoustic mode
are too large at Gamma point
increase cutoff energy or k-points sampling.
The three eigenvalues are: 2.354541E-04 3.769631E-06 -9.936443E-05
and the elastic tensor from two different runs with same input parameters are
Elastic Tensor (relaxed ion) (unit:10^2GP):
(at fixed electric field boundary condition)
0.5479039 -0.2078001 0.4736602 0.0000000 -0.4454188 0.0000000
-0.2078002 -1.6226535 -0.1456602 0.0000000 -0.0503831 0.0000000
0.4736602 -0.1456602 -1.7632272 0.0000000 -0.8610705 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.1100148 0.0000000 -0.0896016
-0.4454189 -0.0503831 -0.8610705 0.0000000 0.4057265 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.0896016 0.0000000 -0.2808213
Elastic Tensor (relaxed ion) (unit:10^2GP):
(at fixed electric field boundary condition)
-2.4936683 -1.4720537 -0.7323263 0.0000000 0.4624234 0.0000000
-1.4720537 -3.5190605 -1.2099844 0.0000000 -0.3453437 0.0000000
-0.7323263 -1.2099843 -0.5868132 0.0000000 0.0348794 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 -1.1759601 0.0000000 -0.3877170
0.4624235 -0.3453437 0.0348793 0.0000000 -0.7692686 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.3877171 0.0000000 -1.5326429
Attachment is the input file.Thanks for you suggestion.
--
D. R. Hamann
Mat-Sim Research LLC | Deptartment of Physics
P.O. Box 742 | and Astronomy
Murray Hill, NJ 07974 | Rutgers University
phone: 908-370-8079 | 732-445-4381
email: drhamann@mat-simresearch.com
- results are case sensitive, waigen zhang, 06/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, D. R. Hamann, 06/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, waigen zhang, 06/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, D. R. Hamann, 06/13/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, D. R. Hamann, 06/13/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, waigen zhang, 06/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, waigen zhang, 06/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, D. R. Hamann, 06/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, waigen zhang, 06/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, waigen zhang, 06/14/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, D. R. Hamann, 06/13/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, D. R. Hamann, 06/13/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, waigen zhang, 06/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] results are case sensitive, D. R. Hamann, 06/11/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.