Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] 'leave_new : decision taken to exit ...'--what's wrong in my GW input file?

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] 'leave_new : decision taken to exit ...'--what's wrong in my GW input file?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Xiaohong Zheng <zheng@chips.ncsu.edu>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] 'leave_new : decision taken to exit ...'--what's wrong in my GW input file?
  • Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:34:45 -0400

Dear Thanusit,

Thank you very much. The system here is a SiH4 molecule in a big box (22.4871 x 22.4871 x 22.4871). I have two types of atoms. I only use the Gamma points. And the coordinates are correct. In fact, I did a SCF calculation(only scf step) and I got the correct eigenvalues. But after I insert the lines "nbandkss -1" and "istwfk 1" to get the _KSS file, then it does nothing, even does not do the SCF calculation. At the end of the log file, it reads

"
...
xangst 4.9999999868E+00 4.9999999868E+00 4.9999999868E+00
5.8603052863E+00 5.8603052863E+00 5.8603052863E+00
4.1396947402E+00 4.1396947402E+00 5.8603052863E+00
4.1396947402E+00 5.8603052863E+00 4.1396947402E+00
5.8603052863E+00 4.1396947402E+00 4.1396947402E+00
xcart 9.4486306000E+00 9.4486306000E+00 9.4486306000E+00
1.1074372000E+01 1.1074372000E+01 1.1074372000E+01
7.8228893000E+00 7.8228893000E+00 1.1074372000E+01
7.8228893000E+00 1.1074372000E+01 7.8228893000E+00
1.1074372000E+01 7.8228893000E+00 7.8228893000E+00
xred 4.2016806401E-01 4.2016806401E-01 4.2016806401E-01
4.9246262664E-01 4.9246262664E-01 4.9246262664E-01
3.4787350584E-01 3.4787350584E-01 4.9246262664E-01
3.4787350584E-01 4.9246262664E-01 3.4787350584E-01
4.9246262664E-01 3.4787350584E-01 3.4787350584E-01
znucl 14.00000 1.00000

================================================================================

chkinp: machine precision is 2.2204460492503131E-16

chkinp: Checking input parameters for consistency.

leave_new : decision taken to exit ...
"

So, what's wrong please?

Thank you!

Xiaohong

Thanusit


Dr. Thanusit Burinprakhon wrote:
Dear Zheng

There seems to be some of your input variables that may cause the trouble.

Point-1:
# Definition of the unit cell: fcc
acell 3*22.487741 # This is equivalent to 10.217 10.217 10.217
rprim 1.0 0.0 0.0 # FCC primitive vectors (to be scaled by acell)
0.0 1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0

For Si, the above input should be
# Definition of the unit cell: fcc
acell 3*10.217 # This is equivalent to 10.217 10.217 10.217
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5 # FCC primitive vectors (to be scaled by acell)
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0

Point-2:
> # Definition of the atom types
ntypat 2 # There is only one type of atom
znucl 14 1 # The keyword "znucl" refers to the atomic number of the

The above inputs should be
ntypat 1 # There is only one type of atom
znucl 14 # Z number of Si

Point-3 :
# Definition of the atoms
natom 5 # There are two atoms
typat 1 4*2 # They both are of type 1, that is, Silicon.
xcart # Reduced coordinate of atoms
9.4486306 9.4486306 9.4486306
11.0743720 11.0743720 11.0743720
7.8228893 7.8228893 11.0743720
7.8228893 11.0743720 7.8228893
11.0743720 7.8228893 7.8228893

Not sure if above is another way of specifying definition of atoms. But
what certainly works is

natom 2 # There are two atoms
typat 1 1 # They both are of type 1, that is, Silicon.
xred # Reduced coordinate of atoms
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.25 0.25 0.25

Also, please check you k point grid for SCF calculation, it does look
starange to me. But I'm not sure if it's not right. Anyway, make sure
that the k-point grids contains Gamma point which is used in th GW
calculation.

At last,try the test tgw1_2 is a good idea.

Hope this helps.

Kind Regards,
Thanusit Burinprakhon





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page