Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - RE: [abinit-forum] "leave_new : decision taken to exit ..."--what's wrong in my GW input file?

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

RE: [abinit-forum] "leave_new : decision taken to exit ..."--what's wrong in my GW input file?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Semichaevsky, Andrey " <Andrey_Semichaevsky@uml.edu>
  • To: <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] "leave_new : decision taken to exit ..."--what's wrong in my GW input file?
  • Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:58:38 -0400

Hi Xiaohong,

The problem seems to be with dataset 3, although there are syntax errors.
Then there is
something wrong with parameter values. Perhaps your self-energy calculation
cannot
properly use the self-consistent KSS file because of some parameter mismatch.

I would check values of:
1) ecut (maybe, it is a good idea to apply it only to dataset 1)
2) number of bands in your KSS file vs. number of bands in dataset 3.

Andrey

________________________________

From: Xiaohong Zheng [mailto:zheng@chips.ncsu.edu]
Sent: Wed 10/31/2007 10:50 AM
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] "leave_new : decision taken to exit ..."--what's
wrong in my GW input file?



Hello, Andrey,

Thank you very much for your attention to my question. At the end of the
log file, it reads
"
xangst 4.9999999868E+00 4.9999999868E+00 4.9999999868E+00
5.8603052863E+00 5.8603052863E+00 5.8603052863E+00
4.1396947402E+00 4.1396947402E+00 5.8603052863E+00
4.1396947402E+00 5.8603052863E+00 4.1396947402E+00
5.8603052863E+00 4.1396947402E+00 4.1396947402E+00
xcart 9.4486306000E+00 9.4486306000E+00 9.4486306000E+00
1.1074372000E+01 1.1074372000E+01 1.1074372000E+01
7.8228893000E+00 7.8228893000E+00 1.1074372000E+01
7.8228893000E+00 1.1074372000E+01 7.8228893000E+00
1.1074372000E+01 7.8228893000E+00 7.8228893000E+00
xred 4.2016806401E-01 4.2016806401E-01 4.2016806401E-01
4.9246262664E-01 4.9246262664E-01 4.9246262664E-01
3.4787350584E-01 3.4787350584E-01 4.9246262664E-01
3.4787350584E-01 4.9246262664E-01 3.4787350584E-01
4.9246262664E-01 3.4787350584E-01 3.4787350584E-01
znucl 14.00000 1.00000

================================================================================

chkinp: machine precision is 2.2204460492503131E-16

chkinp: Checking input parameters for consistency, jdtset= 1.

chkinp: Checking input parameters for consistency, jdtset= 2.

chkinp: Checking input parameters for consistency, jdtset= 3.

leave_new : decision taken to exit ...
"

At the end of the output file, it reads

"

chkinp: Checking input parameters for consistency, jdtset= 1.

chkinp: Checking input parameters for consistency, jdtset= 2.

chkinp: Checking input parameters for consistency, jdtset= 3.
"

So, what's wrong please? In another calculation, if I only do SCF step,
then I can get correct eigenvalues. But if I insert two more lines into
the input file, namely,

"nbandkss -1" and "istwfk 1"

then it does not do anything. It only goes to "chkinp: Checking input
parameters for consistency." then it stops.

Xiaohong



Semichaevsky, Andrey wrote:
> Hello Xiaohong,
>
> It is not very clear from the input file you sent - the input does not
> look much different from the test example or from GW simulations I have run
> in the past - could you show the lines of the output file that precede the
> message "...decision taken to exit" - those lines may contain some clue.
> Andrey Semichaevsky
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Xiaohong Zheng [mailto:zheng@chips.ncsu.edu]
> Sent: Tue 10/30/2007 10:16 PM
> To: forum@abinit.org
> Subject: [abinit-forum] "leave_new : decision taken to exit ..."--what's
> wrong in my GW input file?
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to build an input file for a GW caculation. This is the
> first time I am running this code. I prepared the input file by taking
> the ~abinit/tests/tutorial/Input/tgw1_1.in as a template. But the run
> does not go forward. At the end of the output file, it reads "leave_new
> : decision taken to exit ..."
>
> Could you have a look into it for me, please? Where is it wrong in my
> input file?
>
> My input file:
> =========================================
> # Crystalline silicon
> # Calculation of the GW corrections
> # Dataset 1: ground state calculation and of the kss file for 10
> k-points in IBZ
> # Dataset 2: calculation of the screening (epsilon^-1 matrix for W)
> # Dataset 3: calculation of the Self-Energy matrix elements (GW corrections)
>
> ndtset 3
>
> # Definition of parameters for the calculation of the KSS file
> nbandkss1 -1 # Number of bands in KSS file (-1 means the
> maximum possible)
> nband1 10 # Number of (occ and empty) bands to be computed
> istwfk1 1
>
> # Calculation of the screening (epsilon^-1 matrix)
> optdriver2 3 # Screening calculation
> getkss2 -1 # Obtain KSS file from previous dataset
> nband2 30 # Bands to be used in the screening calculation
> ecutwfn2 2.1 # Cut-off energy of the planewave set to represent
> the wavefunctions
> ecuteps2 3.6 # Cut-off energy of the planewave set to represent
> the dielectric matrix
> ppmfrq2 16.7 eV # Imaginary frequency where to calculate the screening
>
> # Calculation of the Self-Energy matrix elements (GW corrections)
> optdriver3 4 # Self-Energy calculation
> getkss3 -2 # Obtain KSS file from dataset 1
> getscr3 -1 # Obtain SCR file from previous dataset
> nband3 30 # Bands to be used in the Self-Energy calculation
> ecutwfn3 5.0 # Planewaves to be used to represent the wavefunctions
> ecutsigx3 6.0 # Dimension of the G sum in Sigma_x
> # (the dimension in Sigma_c is controlled by npweps)
> nkptgw3 1 # number of k-point where to calculate the
> GW correction
> kptgw3 # k-points
> 0.000 0.000 0.000
> bdgw3 1 8 # calculate GW corrections for bands from 4
> to 5
>
>
> # Data common to the three different datasets
>
> # Definition of the unit cell: fcc
> acell 3*22.487741 # This is equivalent to 10.217 10.217 10.217
> rprim 1.0 0.0 0.0 # FCC primitive vectors (to be scaled by acell)
> 0.0 1.0 0.0
> 0.0 0.0 1.0
>
> # Definition of the atom types
> ntypat 2 # There is only one type of atom
> znucl 14 1 # The keyword "znucl" refers to the atomic number of the
> # possible type(s) of atom. The pseudopotential(s)
> # mentioned in the "files" file must correspond
> # to the type(s) of atom. Here, the only type is Silicon.
>
> # Definition of the atoms
> natom 5 # There are two atoms
> typat 1 4*2 # They both are of type 1, that is, Silicon.
> xcart # Reduced coordinate of atoms
> 9.4486306 9.4486306 9.4486306
> 11.0743720 11.0743720 11.0743720
> 7.8228893 7.8228893 11.0743720
> 7.8228893 11.0743720 7.8228893
> 11.0743720 7.8228893 7.8228893
>
>
> # Definition of the k-point grid
> kptopt 0 # Option for the automatic generation of k points,
> nkpt 1
> kpt 0.0 0.0 0.0
>
> # Use only symmorphic operations
> symmorphi 0
>
> # Definition of the planewave basis set (at convergence 16 Rydberg 8
> Hartree)
> ecut 8.0 # Maximal kinetic energy cut-off, in Hartree
>
> # Definition of the SCF procedure
> nstep 10 # Maximal number of SCF cycles
> toldfe 1.0d-6 # Will stop when this tolerance is achieved on
> total energy
> diemac 12.0 # Although this is not mandatory, it is worth to
> # precondition the SCF cycle. The model dielectric
> # function used as the standard preconditioner
> # is described in the "dielng" input variable section.
> # Here, we follow the prescription for bulk silicon.
>
>
> # This line added when defaults were changed (v5.3) to keep the
> previous, old behaviour
> iscf 5
>
> =========================================================================
>
>
> So, what's wrong, please?
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Xiaohong
>
>
>
>



<<winmail.dat>>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page