The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

[Sergey Lisenkov <proffess@yandex.ru>]

 Dear all,

   I have compiled 5.4.4 version on two different opteron clusters using 
pgi-7.1 .1 and pathscale-3.1 compilers. Running my job I see in the log file:

-P-0000 == DATASET  1 
==================================================================
-P-0000
dtsetcopy : copying area  algalch    the actual size (^C^@^@^@) of the index 
(^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^@
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  kberry     the actual size (^T^@^@^@) of the index 
(^B^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^A
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  nband      the actual size (^D^@^@^@) of the index 
(^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^A
^@^@^@)
  dtsetcopy : allocated densty=  T
dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (^C^@^@^@) of the index 
(^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^@
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (^C^@^@^@) of the index 
(^B^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^@
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  occ_orig   the actual size (@^A^@^@) of the index 
(^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (270
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  shiftk     the actual size ^@^@^@) of the index 
(^B^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^A^@
^@^@)

However, if I run this job using 5.3.4 version I don't see such symbols:

-P-0000 == DATASET  1 
==================================================================
-P-0000
 dtsetcopy : copying area  algalch    the actual size (            3
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (            0
  )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  kberry     the actual size (           20
 ) of the index (            2 )  differs from its standard size (            
1
  )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  nband      the actual size (            4
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (            
1
  )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (            3
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (            0
  )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (            3
 ) of the index (            2 )  differs from its standard size (            0
  )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  occ_orig   the actual size (          320
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (          
184
  )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  shiftk     the actual size (            8
 ) of the index (            2 )  differs from its standard size (            
1
  )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug

I tried to lower optimization options but the results was the same. Should I 
ignore such unreadable symbols or not?

  thanks,
    Sergey