The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

["Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>]

Hi,

If the automatic tests passes (you know how to check that, don't you ?) do not worry. This is only informative prints. However this may be also a symptom of the problems reported by Joe earlier.

regards

PMA

On Nov 29, 2007 4:42 PM, Sergey Lisenkov <proffess@yandex.ru> wrote:

 Dear all,

  I have compiled 5.4.4 version on two different opteron clusters using pgi-7.1 .1 and pathscale-3.1 compilers. Running my job I see in the log file:

-P-0000 == DATASET  1 ==================================================================
-P-0000
dtsetcopy : copying area  algalch    the actual size (^C^@^@^@) of the index (^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^@
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  kberry     the actual size (^T^@^@^@) of the index (^B^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^A
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  nband      the actual size (^D^@^@^@) of the index (^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^A
^@^@^@)
 dtsetcopy : allocated densty=  T
dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (^C^@^@^@) of the index (^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^@
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (^C^@^@^@) of the index (^B^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^@
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  occ_orig   the actual size (@^A^@^@) of the index (^A^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (270
^@^@^@)
dtsetcopy : copying area  shiftk     the actual size ^@^@^@) of the index (^B^@^@^@)  differs from its standard size (^A^@
^@^@)

However, if I run this job using 5.3.4 version I don't see such symbols:

-P-0000 == DATASET  1 ==================================================================
-P-0000
 dtsetcopy : copying area  algalch    the actual size (            3
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (            0
 )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  kberry     the actual size (           20
 ) of the index (            2 )  differs from its standard size (            1
 )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  nband      the actual size (            4
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (            1
 )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (            3
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (            0
 )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  mixalch    the actual size (            3
 ) of the index (            2 )  differs from its standard size (            0
 )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  occ_orig   the actual size (          320
 ) of the index (            1 )  differs from its standard size (          184
 )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug
 dtsetcopy : copying area  shiftk     the actual size (            8
 ) of the index (            2 )  differs from its standard size (            1
 )
 dtsetcopy : this could be a bug

I tried to lower optimization options but the results was the same. Should I ignore such unreadable symbols or not?

 thanks,
   Sergey

-- 
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade