forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xavier Gonze <xavier.gonze@uclouvain.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:09:45 +0100
On 26 Dec 2007, at 17:58, Jess Kondor wrote:
Dear all,
I'm performing convergence tests for the material I am going to study. I use opium generated pseudopotentials. The test on absolute convergence of the total energy shows me that ecut=65 Ry is appropriate value (error on total energy is < 5meV/atom). But I am primary interested in other properties (lattice parameters, electric polarization, etc) rather than total energy. So, I tested those properties vs ecut (from 40 through 70 Ry). I found that those properties are in very good agreement with available data starting from Ecut = 45 Ry (except one thing - the pressure at low Ecut is very high ~25-70 GPa, and at 70 Ry pressure < 0.01 GPa).
Concerning the latter, do you use ecutsm ?
So, I am wondering which ecut I should use in my further calculations. I am going to study surfaces of my material.You can likely explore your system with 45 Ry, then ... come back to a convergence study
for the properties of the surface that you care about. Convergence tests should
be done on the property you are interested in.
X.
- convergence tests, Jess Kondor, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Xavier Gonze, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Jess Kondor, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Andrew Rappe, 12/29/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Jess Kondor, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Xavier Gonze, 12/26/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.