forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Jess Kondor" <kondor.jess@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: convergence tests
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 10:58:28 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=fKz0qbsZa9tJum1nHY71VtZe3xdj46M7uTE08az6DD8akcdeJUTcMxpc1qRGydzGZg1fEkKRMYcbXj4OiQxw1XdXvuQ3sv9zeoJ3V2PUnPVnyj8UcbK4nSBXJVUNz5lOEwB1RkmG5q3aJR/QoZ8W7ZGnYEV+F88tJuyP97LT5eI=
Dear all,
I'm performing convergence tests for the material I am going to study. I use opium generated pseudopotentials. The test on absolute convergence of the total energy shows me that ecut=65 Ry is appropriate value (error on total energy is < 5meV/atom). But I am primary interested in other properties (lattice parameters, electric polarization, etc) rather than total energy. So, I tested those properties vs ecut (from 40 through 70 Ry). I found that those properties are in very good agreement with available data starting from Ecut = 45 Ry (except one thing - the pressure at low Ecut is very high ~25-70 GPa, and at 70 Ry pressure < 0.01 GPa). So, I am wondering which ecut I should use in my further calculations. I am going to study surfaces of my material.
Thanks,
Jess
- convergence tests, Jess Kondor, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Xavier Gonze, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Jess Kondor, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Andrew Rappe, 12/29/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Jess Kondor, 12/26/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] convergence tests, Xavier Gonze, 12/26/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.