forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "P. Ganesh" <pganesh@ciw.edu>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: accoustic Phon.
- Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:34:49 -0500
Dear All,
Wish you all a very Happy New Year.
I am trying to compute the phonon DOS of a 10 atom primitive cell (insulator material). I am using Abinit 5.4.2.
I find that the accoustic phonons at Gamma (the first 3 numbers in the freq. list) are far away from 'zero'. They are all around ~30 cm-1. I have used a 6x6x6 kpt. mesh and 65 Ha cutoff. I also use 'E' filed perturbation to get the Lo-To splitting. Apart from the common input the special inputs for my 4 datasets are below. (The runs are done separately and not from same input file) The nband has been set exactly to the number of occupied bands in all calculations.
Dataset-1: (GS calculation)
toldfe 1.0d-20
Dataset-2: (non-self consistent calculation)
iscf -3 # Need this non-self-consistent option for d/dk
kptopt 2 # Modify default to use time-reversal symmetry
tolwfr 1.0d-22 # Use wave function residual criterion instead
getwfk 1
getden 1
Dataset-3: (ddk calculation at G)
nqpt 1
qpt 0.00000000E+00 0.00000000E+00 0.00000000E+00
iscf -3 # Need this non-self-consistent option for d/dk
kptopt 2 # Modify default to use time-reversal symmetry
rfphon 0 # Cancel default
rfelfd 2 # Calculate d/dk wave function only
tolwfr 1.0d-22 # Use wave function residual criterion instead
getwfk 1
rfdir 1 1 1
Dataset-4: (phonon perturbation at G)
nqpt 1
qpt 0.00000000E+00 0.00000000E+00 0.00000000E+00
getwfk 1 # Use GS wave functions from dataset1
getddk 1
kptopt 2 # Need full k-point set for finite-Q response
rfphon 1 # Do phonon response
rfatpol 1 10 # Treat displacements of all atoms
rfdir 1 1 1 # Do all directions (symmetry will be used)
tolvrs 1.0d-22 # This default is active for sets 3-10
rfelfd 3
prtwf 0
I would like to know why the phonon freq. are around 30cm-1 and not zero. If it is the kpt. or ecut. that I should increase, which one matters more? Is my convergence criteria good enough to get phonons ?
Thanks,
Ganesh
- accoustic Phon., P. Ganesh, 01/01/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic Phon., Yong Liu, 01/02/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic Phon., P. Ganesh, 01/02/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic Phon., Yong Liu, 01/02/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic Phon., P. Ganesh, 01/02/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic Phon., Yong Liu, 01/02/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.