forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "D. R. Hamann" <drhamann@mat-simresearch.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] B2 NiAl
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:05:53 -0500
Matthieu Verstraete wrote:
This is correct. However, the most accurate results should be gotten using the response-function methods as for Al in the tutorial. Why the program aborted when you tried this is probably a compiler issue, since the test suite does test this kind of calculation. See if you can run tests/v4/test 79 successfully, which does elastic constant calculations for spin-polarized Fe.
Is NiAl spin polarized?
Therefore I decided to determine the elastic constants by calculation of theDon Hamann has told us several times there is quite a large error on the end result. Using finite differences of stress tensors should be better (correct?).
energies of strained samples.
If you can't you are probably dealing with a compiler bug.
I'll repeat other's comments that you do need to do convergence testing in both ecut and the k sample. Ni is very demanding (test 79 is nowhere near converged).
Don Hamann
--
D. R. Hamann
Mat-Sim Research LLC | Deptartment of Physics
P.O. Box 742 | and Astronomy
Murray Hill, NJ 07974 | Rutgers University
phone: 908-370-8079 | 732-445-4381
email: drhamann@mat-simresearch.com
- B2 NiAl, Stephen . Hocker, 02/20/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] B2 NiAl, Chol-Jun Yu, 02/20/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] B2 NiAl, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 02/20/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] B2 NiAl, Chol-Jun Yu, 02/20/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] B2 NiAl, Matthieu Verstraete, 02/20/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] B2 NiAl, D. R. Hamann, 02/20/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.