forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Scott Beckman <spbeckman@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:44:27 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-priority:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=AlX0b0MoUHC0NPEBex1OEGsJDtW0Dt2R+pNy2FRSCMSTxZ3dZn1aNIDNbuXBA/Y2r7ogoQmRKE76qvgM4U5AxdjFeh1mNZRquxBIiAI5ICohOcn/1zTsXpyD6u6zMAR9/9S34WVCGn9P7lDBVNcUVLSnm/SG+XdPduAyHSbUUHY=
The number of k-points is probably OK, but in my experience an ecut of around 20 Hartree is needed.
It is worth noting that the Ge pseudopotential is a bit odd. The all- electron LDA calculation returns a band gap of 0 eV, but the pseudopotentials don't. If you take a pseudopotential generator and create a dozen or so potentials and test them you'll find differences in the band structure. However, the structural and mechanical properties seem pretty constant and match experiment well. If you're going to work with Ge, it might be worth looking at: Tiago et al. PRB V69 P125212 (2004).
Scott
On Mar 7, 2008, at 5:04 AM, Aldo Humberto Romero wrote:
Dear Yang
your cutoff energy is way to low... 12Ry for a TM pseudo
is really low (even in Vasp, which are are soft pseudos,
the cutoff is higher)... you should check energy convergence
as function of cutoff and then look at acell.
By the way, I have not experience with Ge,
but you can also play with the number
of Kpoints after you energy convergence study.
regards
-aldo.
Dear All,
I optimized the lattice constant of Ge following the ABINIT tutorial. The
value I got is about 5.52Angstrom, which is not in good agreement with the
experimental value (5.66Angstrom), the gap about 2%. I did the similar
calculation using VASP, and the error is within 0.5%, so I think the
lattice constant of Ge I got by ABINIT is not nice, but I don?t know where
I lost. Can any one there help me to correct my input files or give me
some suggestions? The pseudopotential I use is Troullier-Martins LDA
pseudopotential, and the input file is like following.
_____________________________
# optimize the lattice constat
optcell 1
ionmov 3
ntime 10
dilatmx 1.1
ecutsm 0.5
#Definition of the unit cell
acell 3*10.699 # This is equivalent to 10.62 10.62 10.62
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5 # In lessons 1 and 2, these primitive vectors
0.5 0.0 0.5 # (to be scaled by acell) were 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0.5 0.5 0.0 # that is, the default.
#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 1 # There is only one type of atom
znucl 32 # The keyword "znucl" refers to the atomic number of the
# possible type(s) of atom. The pseudopotential(s)
# mentioned in the "files" file must correspond
# to the type(s) of atom. Here, the only type is Ge.
#Definition of the atoms
natom 2 # There are two atoms
typat 1 1 # They both are of type 1, that is, Ge
xred # This keyword indicate that the location of the atoms
# will follow, one triplet of number for each atom
0.0 0.0 0.0 # Triplet giving the REDUCED coordinate of atom 1.
1/4 1/4 1/4 # Triplet giving the REDUCED coordinate of atom 2.
# Note the use of fractions (remember the limited
# interpreter capabilities of ABINIT)
#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 12.0 # Maximal kinetic energy cut-off, in Hartree
#Definition of the k-point grid
kptopt 1 # Option for the automatic generation of k points,
taking
# into account the symmetry
ngkpt 6 6 6 # This is a 6x6x6 grid based on the primitive vectors
nshiftk 4 # of the reciprocal space (that form a BCC lattice !),
# repeated four times, with different shifts :
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.5
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 60 # Maximal number of SCF cycles
toldfe 1.0d-6 # Will stop when, twice in a row, the difference
# between two consecutive evaluations of total energy
# differ by less than toldfe (in Hartree)
diemac 12.0
Thanks.
Best regards,
Yang Ming
******
Computational Condensed Matter Physics
Department of Physics
National University of Singapore
Singapore, 117542
Tel: (65) 65164335 (office)
Email: mingyang@nus.edu.sg
--
Dr. Aldo Humberto Romero
FULL PROFESSOR CINVESTAV - Unidad Queretaro
Libramiento Norponiente 2000
Real de Juriquilla, CP 76230, Qro, Queretaro
Mexico
Phone: + 52 442 441 4909
NEW PHONE (FROM MARCH 13): +52 (442) 211 9909
Fax: + 52 442 441 4938
Email: aromero@qro.cinvestav.mx
WWW: qro.cinvestav.mx/~aromero
- Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, mingyang, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, hyello25 Qgrui, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Mitrokhin, 03/07/2008
- {Spam?} Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Aldo Humberto Romero, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Scott Beckman, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Hua Bao, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Hua Bao, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Scott Beckman, 03/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.