forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Vincenzo Fiorentini <vincenzo.fiorentini@dsf.unica.it>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:23:01 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=Y2EaW0V2a/PNhfN7qpW872eOqjVHhmupYMzfaFn8HCbXyNJ/acbkxugdqSS/f5q7j7LccscwM6W9uHmQr8QYOZ6b+NC4PYc/3DVD0lE9VIJHILUggzkCkGjIkyZvcDc3R5y1YajtBkF7cpFlRsVmdrJHNtzu9nOKnyY3+Cq6lcY=
Dear Hua Bao and all,
if I may interject an "archeology" comment: at least in scalar- relativistic calculations
- different pseudopotentials produce (slightly) different equilibrium volumes, and using the theoretical volume for each pseudo (the consistent thing to do, of course) generally produces consistently the same ordering of conduction states, i.e. roughly a similar band structure (I showed this when I was young, in Solid State Commun. 81, 871 (1992));
- using theoretical volumes (using a wel-behaving, well accepted pseudopotential set such as BHS) generally produces quite decent band structures, pressure coefficients, and effective masses (as shown in another oldie of mine: Phys. Rev. B 46, 2086 (1992));
- finally for GaAs d states produce some (fairly benign: not so GaN...!) effects on the bands. With different levels of treatment such as a) including d-states, b) applying non-linear core correction, c) doing nothing, you find the lattice constant shrinks: 10.60, 10.50, 10.39 bohr respectively, if I remember correctly (I showed this in The Physics of Semiconductors, ed. D. J. Lockwood, World Scientific, Singapore, 1995, p.137-140 - proceedings of ICPS 22).
best - Vincenzo Fiorentini
- Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, mingyang, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, hyello25 Qgrui, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Mitrokhin, 03/07/2008
- {Spam?} Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Aldo Humberto Romero, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Scott Beckman, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Hua Bao, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Hua Bao, 03/07/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about the lattice constant optimation of Ge, Scott Beckman, 03/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.