forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?

From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:16:10 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=D6SkisjS1xrZV7wkR6odgzle82In5jtmjUh3k9vFuLge0RdGIMtk+7EweKS3zhvFQRK+BxNNvfCWpCf23o58POrXlUi4wpz1hRskthQerfr+vQJsoY6uGPyIUINL32rcvrgdizUdLhIhXNY97KTw9p3zfZul5QUxhBUF7zdYTTM=

I think the integration is performed on the "super" grid formed by the
4 shifted grid.

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:08 PM, <jjr19@uakron.edu> wrote:
> > nshiftk 4 will make 4 grid shifted from each others by one of the
> > provides "shiftk" vector.
>
> So is the Brillouin zone integration done over all the points in all four
> of the grids?
>
> BTW, is there any literature specifically on this use of multiple grids.
> I've seen plenty on Monkhorst-Pack and on shifting a particular k-point
> grid, but not on this particular aspect of generating k-points.
>

--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade

Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?, jjr19, 03/21/2008
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/21/2008
  - Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?, D. R. Hamann, 03/21/2008