Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "D. R. Hamann" <drhamann@mat-simresearch.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Why multiple k-point shifts recommended?
  • Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:00:51 -0400

This is a repeat-send of an initial reply to the post that didn't get through for some reason:

Dear JJR,

The "default" is nshiftk 1, shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5. This gives an efficient zone sampling for some lattices. For fcc, however, this sampling breaks symmetry, which the nshiftk 4 example you have below restores. Your assumption that the shiftk's are added is incorrect. The k grid is replicated nshiftk times with shiftk as origins. For hexagonal lattices, only nshiftk 1, shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.5 is appropriate (once again, for symmetry-breaking reasons).

D. R. Hamann

Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
I think the integration is performed on the "super" grid formed by the
4 shifted grid.

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:08 PM, <jjr19@uakron.edu> wrote:
nshiftk 4 will make 4 grid shifted from each others by one of the
> provides "shiftk" vector.

So is the Brillouin zone integration done over all the points in all four of
the grids?

BTW, is there any literature specifically on this use of multiple grids.
I've seen plenty on Monkhorst-Pack and on shifting a particular k-point grid,
but not on this particular aspect of generating k-points.





--
D. R. Hamann
Mat-Sim Research LLC | Deptartment of Physics
P.O. Box 742 | and Astronomy
Murray Hill, NJ 07974 | Rutgers University
phone: 908-370-8079 | 732-445-4381

email: drhamann@mat-simresearch.com





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page