forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: matthieu verstraete <matthieu.jean.verstraete@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence...
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:19:46 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aqk121Qf+ikTzFx5hHyiw5M5+K7NA+ajUvhSgBr89O9TMSYv94VOKXzhI18DFIRZJI Qu7fupehnnK+N7dLYNBaY2bOKX9OwHe5dLKfreZ+rKOttTwjtBgvhfVwDQ4jOyNocdpi c0CAhm95jeHoP4TVUHokO3VPQVCQW0cRXdxj4=
Hello abinists,
I have come upon a strange behavior in abinit (not the first, of course) and was wondering if anyone had heard of it or an explanation (v5.6 on opteron 64 bit RHEL, g95 compiled, sequential).
In converging a ground state for graphene (what else), I need to use only symmorphic symmetry operations. The strange behavior is that, without the non-symmorphic symmetry operations, abinit does not converge the wavefunctions below 1.e-13 or so (even after 200 steps), and the eigenvalues are not converged below mHa accuracy. With all the symops the convergence down to tolwfr 1.e-20 is effortless. Why the difference? Numerical noise is one possibility, but plenty of symops are left in the calculation...
Matthieu
--
input file
# etsfio
prtvxc 1
prtden 1
accesswff 3
istwfk 127*1
acell 2*2.46 10. Angstr
angdeg 90 90 120
#symmorphi 0
znucl 6
natom 2
ntypat 1
typat 1 1
xred
0 0 0.
1./3. 2./3. 0.
ecut 35
kptopt 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0 0 0
ngkpt 36 36 1
tsmear 0.1 eV
#tsmear 0.0001
nband 10
nbdbuf 2
tolwfr 1.0e-20
nstep 200
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Matthieu Verstraete
European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF)
Dpto. Fisica de Materiales,
U. del Pais Vasco,
Centro Joxe Mari Korta, Av. de Tolosa, 72, Phone: +34-943018393
E-20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain Fax : +34-943018390
Mail : matthieu.jean.verstraete@gmail.com
http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mjv500
- [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Matteo Giantomassi, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Zeila Zanolli, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Matteo Giantomassi, 03/03/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.