forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Matteo Giantomassi" <Matteo.Giantomassi@uclouvain.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence...
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:29:47 +0100 (CET)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=uclouvain.be; h=message-id: in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=selucl; b=NG+TH hHeh5unhiOqkV4P1xN15pcTsaSl3rNCFNvhLa/Kxu8H4nhQjv0gp7aseYAPWjxb5 UGl1UrSByMkOZxp+W7K+/h2XNNutqwyq62AfyDYcTW5k0ccPLjQSI9u1gEsCLhag g1HdzWrlg80NDhJYfLFXqHYhTRDPwfDIS0MNxc=
- Importance: Normal
Hello abinists,
>
> I have come upon a strange behavior in abinit (not the first, of course)
> and
> was wondering if anyone had heard of it or an explanation (v5.6 on opteron
> 64 bit RHEL, g95 compiled, sequential).
>
> In converging a ground state for graphene (what else), I need to use only
> symmorphic symmetry operations. The strange behavior is that, without the
> non-symmorphic symmetry operations, abinit does not converge the
> wavefunctions below 1.e-13 or so (even after 200 steps), and the
> eigenvalues
> are not converged below mHa accuracy. With all the symops the convergence
> down to tolwfr 1.e-20 is effortless. Why the difference? Numerical noise
> is
> one possibility, but plenty of symops are left in the calculation...
>
Hi, Matthieu
I've never encountered such a kind of problem but
it might be related to a partial fulfillment of the symmetry properties
of the density and of the generated potentials.
Do you have the same number of k-points in the IBZ when non-symmorphic
operations are removed?
Just for curiosity: are you pruning non-symmorphic ops because you want to
generate a KSS file for GW calculations with abinit?
In this case please note that symmorphi=0 is not mandatory anymore
as the GW part is now able to handle non-symmorphic space groups.
Cheers,
Matteo
- [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Matteo Giantomassi, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Zeila Zanolli, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., matthieu verstraete, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] symmorphic convergence..., Matteo Giantomassi, 03/03/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.