forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: <drhendry@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:57:24 +0100 (CET)
Hello,
I'm trying to optimise the geometry of a 20 atom CaTiO3 orthorhombic bulk
dielectric. The process is taking considerably longer and does not seem to be
converging compared with a 6 atom TiO2 rutile bulk dielectric. The max force
does not seem to go below ~ 1e-3, wheres TiO2 max force goes to machine
precision. I'm using Troullier-Martins psps and the input file is below.
Could there be some way of improving this result, or is this to be expected?
Thank you very much, in advance,
David.
#Definition of lattice parameters
#********************************
acell 1.1034564219E+01 1.5140354875E+01 1.0791197046E+01
#Definition of atomic positions and types
#****************************************
natom 20
ntypat 3
znucl 20 22 8
typat 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
xcart
1.74102557844419E-21 6.94219419473125E-21 6.66433845029123E-21
5.51728210951351E+00 2.01064184754249E-07 5.39559852296522E+00
2.72273479496933E-07 7.57017743773540E+00 6.66433845029123E-21
5.51728238178699E+00 7.57017763879958E+00 5.39559852296522E+00
5.52568087138869E+00 3.78516729878331E+00 1.46347634448159E-02
-8.39821732821760E-03 1.13551877777517E+01 5.41023328641004E+00
-5.52568032684173E+00 1.13551875766875E+01 -1.46347634448159E-02
1.10429629809022E+01 3.78516749984750E+00 5.38096375952040E+00
-7.62652580040250E-03 3.78509505890158E+00 -2.23307892067039E-01
5.52490917986087E+00 1.13552600176334E+01 5.17229063089818E+00
7.62707034736165E-03 1.13552598165692E+01 2.23307892067039E-01
5.50965558371311E+00 3.78509525996576E+00 5.61890641503226E+00
2.78700708595054E+00 1.43408602047991E-01 2.66783642053104E+00
2.73027502356297E+00 -1.43408400983806E-01 8.06343494349627E+00
-2.78700845918014E+00 7.71358803235092E+00 -2.66784679121249E+00
8.30429111324061E+00 7.42676704418406E+00 2.72775173175273E+00
-2.78700708595053E+00 -1.43408602047991E-01 -2.66783642053104E+00
8.30428919546405E+00 1.43408803112175E-01 2.72776210243418E+00
2.78700900372710E+00 7.42676684311987E+00 2.66784679121249E+00
2.73027365033337E+00 7.71358823341510E+00 8.06344531417771E+00
#Echange-correlation functional
#******************************
#ixc 1
#Plane wave basis and k-point grid
#*********************************
ecut 30
ngkpt 7 5 7
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
nband 48
#Relax ions and unit cell
#************************
#chkprim 0
#tsmear 0.01
kptopt 2
iscf 7
npulayit 7
iprcel 45
tolrff 0.02
#tolvrs 1.0d-18
#tolmxf 1.0d-8
nstep 200
optcell 2
ionmov 2
ntime 200
dilatmx 1.1
ecutsm 0.5
prtwf 0
prtden 0
- [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, drhendry, 03/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, matthieu verstraete, 03/05/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, drhendry, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, matthieu verstraete, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.