forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Anglade Pierre-Matthieu <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:12:29 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qtEpkFOYrJhKGAK7PIY+YnB70hEJ7NZnhVq4MrnyJdKFC3FvS/wCYzh8eXeOtWgUGk LYlIpUIx24h5K7fkVlA4SSAfjniDhAz37oYkJIpORdWtXAhAoW1BRzFnVG+smZShtJ9F HMMwp90bRJAfT/UEim5mBvg3puUV6ysbz1iqs=
Hi,
When there is a lot of degrees of freedom the "ionmov 2" algorithm
looses some of its efficiency. It is not impossible that you get
better result with a viscous dumping or beeler molecular dynamics.
regards
PMA
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:57 PM, <drhendry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to optimise the geometry of a 20 atom CaTiO3 orthorhombic bulk
> dielectric. The process is taking considerably longer and does not seem to
> be
> converging compared with a 6 atom TiO2 rutile bulk dielectric. The max
> force
> does not seem to go below ~ 1e-3, wheres TiO2 max force goes to machine
> precision. I'm using Troullier-Martins psps and the input file is below.
>
> Could there be some way of improving this result, or is this to be expected?
>
> Thank you very much, in advance,
>
> David.
>
> #Definition of lattice parameters
> #********************************
> acell 1.1034564219E+01 1.5140354875E+01 1.0791197046E+01
>
> #Definition of atomic positions and types
> #****************************************
> natom 20
> ntypat 3
> znucl 20 22 8
> typat 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
> xcart
> 1.74102557844419E-21 6.94219419473125E-21 6.66433845029123E-21
> 5.51728210951351E+00 2.01064184754249E-07 5.39559852296522E+00
> 2.72273479496933E-07 7.57017743773540E+00 6.66433845029123E-21
> 5.51728238178699E+00 7.57017763879958E+00 5.39559852296522E+00
> 5.52568087138869E+00 3.78516729878331E+00 1.46347634448159E-02
> -8.39821732821760E-03 1.13551877777517E+01 5.41023328641004E+00
> -5.52568032684173E+00 1.13551875766875E+01 -1.46347634448159E-02
> 1.10429629809022E+01 3.78516749984750E+00 5.38096375952040E+00
> -7.62652580040250E-03 3.78509505890158E+00 -2.23307892067039E-01
> 5.52490917986087E+00 1.13552600176334E+01 5.17229063089818E+00
> 7.62707034736165E-03 1.13552598165692E+01 2.23307892067039E-01
> 5.50965558371311E+00 3.78509525996576E+00 5.61890641503226E+00
> 2.78700708595054E+00 1.43408602047991E-01 2.66783642053104E+00
> 2.73027502356297E+00 -1.43408400983806E-01 8.06343494349627E+00
> -2.78700845918014E+00 7.71358803235092E+00 -2.66784679121249E+00
> 8.30429111324061E+00 7.42676704418406E+00 2.72775173175273E+00
> -2.78700708595053E+00 -1.43408602047991E-01 -2.66783642053104E+00
> 8.30428919546405E+00 1.43408803112175E-01 2.72776210243418E+00
> 2.78700900372710E+00 7.42676684311987E+00 2.66784679121249E+00
> 2.73027365033337E+00 7.71358823341510E+00 8.06344531417771E+00
>
> #Echange-correlation functional
> #******************************
> #ixc 1
>
> #Plane wave basis and k-point grid
> #*********************************
> ecut 30
> ngkpt 7 5 7
> nshiftk 1
> shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
> nband 48
>
> #Relax ions and unit cell
> #************************
> #chkprim 0
> #tsmear 0.01
> kptopt 2
> iscf 7
> npulayit 7
> iprcel 45
> tolrff 0.02
> #tolvrs 1.0d-18
> #tolmxf 1.0d-8
> nstep 200
> optcell 2
> ionmov 2
> ntime 200
> dilatmx 1.1
> ecutsm 0.5
> prtwf 0
> prtden 0
>
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, drhendry, 03/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, matthieu verstraete, 03/05/2009
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, drhendry, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, matthieu verstraete, 03/05/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] CaTiO3 geometry optimisation, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 03/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.15.