forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Marc Sämann <marc.saemann@ipe.uni-stuttgart.de>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:44:52 +0200
Dear abinit users and developers,
I am trying to do a structural optimization of a 3x3x2 zinc oxide
supercell with 72 atoms.
The optimization works fine with a 4 atom unit cell and a 2x2x1 supercell.
But with larger cells I get a lot of the following warnings:
symatm : WARNING -
Trouble finding symmetrically equivalent atoms
Applying inv of symm number 2 to atom number 19 of typat 1
gives tratom= 2.2222E-01 1.1111E-01 -5.5511E-17.
This is further away from every atom in crystal than the allowed
tolerance.
The inverse symmetry matrix is 0 -1 0
1 1 0
0 0 1
and the nonsymmorphic transl. tnons = 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.5000000
The nearest coordinate differs by 1.111E-01 -1.111E-01 -5.551E-17
for indsym(nearest atom)= 1
My input file is the following:
#ZnO wurzite (hexagonal) structure
#Structural optimization run
#Datasets: convergence on ecut
ndtset 2
# Set 1 : Internal coordinate optimization
ionmov1 2 # Use BFGS algorithm for structural optimization
ntime1 20 # Maximum number of optimization steps
tolmxf1 1.0e-6 # Optimization is converged when maximum force
# (Hartree/Bohr) is less than this maximum
natfix1 3 6 # Fix the position of two symmetry-equivalent atoms
# in doing the structural optimization
iatfix1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
# Set 2 : Lattice parameter relaxation (including re-optimization of
# internal coordinates)
dilatmx2 1.20 # Maximum scaling allowed for lattice parameters
getxred2 -1 # Start with relaxed coordinates from dataset 1
getwfk2 -1 # Start with wave functions from dataset 1
ionmov2 2 # Use BFGS algorithm
ntime2 24 # Maximum number of optimization steps
optcell2 2 # Fully optimize unit cell geometry, keeping symmetry
tolmxf2 1.0e-6 # Convergence limit for forces as above
strfact2 100 # Test convergence of stresses (Hartree/bohr^3) by
# multiplying by this factor and applying force
# convergence test
natfix2 36 # Fix the position of two symmetry-equivalent atoms
# in doing the structural optimization
iatfix2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
#Common input data
#Starting approximation for the unit cell
acell 2*18.72 20.24 #3x3x2 unit cell
angdeg 90 90 120
spgroup 186
brvltt -1
chkprim 1
#Definition of the atom types and atoms
ntypat 2
znucl 30 8
natom 72
typat 36*1 36*2
xred 1/9 2/9 0
4/9 2/9 0
7/9 2/9 0
1/9 5/9 0
4/9 5/9 0
7/9 5/9 0
1/9 8/9 0
4/9 8/9 0
7/9 8/9 0
2/9 1/9 1/4
5/9 1/9 1/4
8/9 1/9 1/4
2/9 4/9 1/4
5/9 4/9 1/4
8/9 4/9 1/4
2/9 7/9 1/4
5/9 7/9 1/4
8/9 7/9 1/4
1/9 2/9 1/2
4/9 2/9 1/2
7/9 2/9 1/2
1/9 5/9 1/2
4/9 5/9 1/2
7/9 5/9 1/2
1/9 8/9 1/2
4/9 8/9 1/2
7/9 8/9 1/2
2/9 1/9 3/4
5/9 1/9 3/4
8/9 1/9 3/4
2/9 4/9 3/4
5/9 4/9 3/4
8/9 4/9 3/4
2/9 7/9 3/4
5/9 7/9 3/4
8/9 7/9 3/4
1/9 2/9 0.189
4/9 2/9 0.189
7/9 2/9 0.189
1/9 5/9 0.189
4/9 5/9 0.189
7/9 5/9 0.189
1/9 8/9 0.189
4/9 8/9 0.189
7/9 8/9 0.189
1/9 2/9 0.689
4/9 2/9 0.689
7/9 2/9 0.689
1/9 5/9 0.689
4/9 5/9 0.689
7/9 5/9 0.689
1/9 8/9 0.689
4/9 8/9 0.689
7/9 8/9 0.689
2/9 1/9 0.439
5/9 1/9 0.439
8/9 1/9 0.439
2/9 4/9 0.439
5/9 4/9 0.439
8/9 4/9 0.439
2/9 7/9 0.439
5/9 7/9 0.439
8/9 7/9 0.439
2/9 1/9 0.939
5/9 1/9 0.939
8/9 1/9 0.939
2/9 4/9 0.939
5/9 4/9 0.939
8/9 4/9 0.939
2/9 7/9 0.939
5/9 7/9 0.939
8/9 7/9 0.939
#Definition of the plane wave basis set
ecut 20.0 # Maximum kinetic energy cutoff (Hartree)
ecutsm 1/2 # Smoothing energy needed for lattice paramete
pawecutdg 40 # optimization. This will be retained for
# consistency throughout.
#Definition of the k-point grid
ngkpt 4 4 4 # 4x4x4 Monkhorst-Pack grid
nshiftk 1 # Use one copy of grid only (default)
shiftk 0.0 0.0 1/2 # This choice of origin for the k point grid
# preserves the hexagonal symmetry of the grid,
# which would be broken by the default choice.
#Definition of the self-consistency procedure
diemac 9.0 # Model dielectric preconditioner
nstep 40 # Maxiumum number of SCF iterations
tolvrs 1.0d-18 # Strict tolerance on (squared) residual of the
# SCF potential needed for accurate forces and
# stresses in the structural optimization, and
# accurate wave functions in the RF calculations
Any help or comments are very appreciated.
Kind regards,
Marc Saemann
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, Marc Sämann, 09/21/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, matthieu verstraete, 09/21/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, Marc Sämann, 09/21/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, Xenophon Krokidis, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, Marc Sämann, 09/23/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, matthieu verstraete, 09/23/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, Marc Sämann, 09/23/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, matthieu verstraete, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, Xenophon Krokidis, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, Marc Sämann, 09/21/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Symmetry problem in hexagonal supercells, matthieu verstraete, 09/21/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.