forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Fabien Bruneval <fabien.bruneval@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] GW approximation and electrostatic potentials
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:20:39 +0200
Hi Rolf,
The options prtpol and prtvxc are meaningless in the context of GW calculations.
The GW self-energy is non-local and dynamic, so it is not a simple function of the position, like v_xc or v_KS.
The code outputs GW-corrected band structure. Does it fit your needs?
Fabien
On 09/22/2009 01:09 PM, Rolf Oettking wrote:
Hello
I have a problem in deriving the total or any other potential in GW
approximation.
Going along the lines of the tutorial in tgw1_9.in and adding
prtpot 1 and
prtvxc 1,
the potentials are printed out correctly in the first and second calculation
steps but not in the fourth (or third).
So, the question is: how would one get the "GW-corrected" potentials
With best regards
Rolf Oettking
- [abinit-forum] GW approximation and electrostatic potentials, Rolf Oettking, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW approximation and electrostatic potentials, Fabien Bruneval, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW approximation and electrostatic potentials, Rolf Öttking, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW approximation and electrostatic potentials, Fabien Bruneval, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW approximation and electrostatic potentials, Rolf Öttking, 09/22/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW approximation and electrostatic potentials, Fabien Bruneval, 09/22/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.