forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: TORRENT Marc <marc.torrent@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:09:08 +0100
- Organization: CEA-DAM
Hi Zeila, I'm not the band-fft expert but concerning PAW I can give some comments: With a lot of atoms, PAW is still not fully efficient. because it misses the parallelisation over atoms; this is 50% coded but not yet ready. (Writing of the missing part is planed soon). So, if you have a large number of atoms your computation could be slow because of MEMORY use. You can try to reduce significantly the memory by setting: pawstgylm 0 in your input file. That's all I can say for now. Of course, if the memory usage is not the origin of your slow behaviour, I let the LOBPCG experts answer... Marc PS: additional question: have your Broyden steps the same length in seq and paral mode ? (I mean : the number of SCF cycles) Le 01/12/10 13:32, Zeila Zanolli a écrit : 87F04E45-A4A9-4613-8410-549579560E1A@uclouvain.be" type="cite">Dear all, |
- [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, TORRENT Marc, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, BOTTIN Francois, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, BOTTIN Francois, 01/14/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/16/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, BOTTIN Francois, 01/14/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Emmanuel Arras, 01/12/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.