forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Emmanuel Arras <emmanuel.arras@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:49:22 +0100
Hi, For your polarized system, use only 2 processors without paral_kgb 1. If you don't have memory issues, it should be almost twice as fast. Emmanuel Zeila Zanolli a écrit : 87F04E45-A4A9-4613-8410-549579560E1A@uclouvain.be" type="cite">Dear all, -- Emmanuel ARRAS L_Sim (Laboratoire de Simulation Atomistique) SP2M / INAC CEA Grenoble tel : 00 33 (0)4 387 86862 |
- [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, TORRENT Marc, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, BOTTIN Francois, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, BOTTIN Francois, 01/14/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/16/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, BOTTIN Francois, 01/14/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Zeila Zanolli, 01/12/2010
- Re: [abinit-forum] efficiency of PAW (and spin) bands/FFT parallelization, Emmanuel Arras, 01/12/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.