forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic frequency for a metal
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:06:18 +0200
Dear Lee Geunsik,
Pseudopotential might be the problem, as suggested by Matthieu.
Another possibility is the number of bands. You might
need more bands than in the ground state.
Xavier
Lee Geunsik wrote:
> Dear abinitors,
>
> I am looking for unstable phonon modes of beta-tin (body-centered
> tetragonal) Si.
> Beta-tin is the high pressure phase next to diamond.
> The problem is to test phonon freq. convergence with respect to input
> parameters.
>
> With the volume corresponding beta-tin phase, electronic calculation shows
> that it is metalic.
> So I computed phonon freq. for q=(0,0,0) with occopt=3, tsmear=0.004,
> nband=6.
> Following is relevant input file.
>
> ndtset 6 udtset 3 2
>
> ecut1? 16.0
> ngkpt1? 3*16
>
> ecut2? 16.0
> ngkpt2? 3*18
>
> ecut3? 18.0
> ngkpt3? 3*16
>
> #Ground state
> kptopt?1 1
> tolvrs?1 1.0d-18
> prtden?1 1
> iscf?1 5
>
> getwfk?2 -1
> rfatpol?2 1 2
> rfdir?2 1 1 1
> rfphon?2 1
> nqpt?2 1
> kptopt?2 2
> tolvrs?2 1.0d-8
> iscf?2 5
> prtwf?2 0
>
> qpt?2 0.0 0.0 0.0
>
> #Common input variables
> occopt 3 tsmear 0.004
> nband 6
>
> fftalg 412
> acell 3*8.88
> rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5
> 0.5 0.0 0.5
> 0.5 0.5 0.0
> ntypat 1
> znucl 14
> natom 2
> typat 1 1
> xred 0.0 0.0 0.0
> 1/4 1/4 1/4
> ixc 2
> nshiftk 1
> shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
> nstep 40
> diemac 12.0
>
>
> Following is the results.
>
> ecut=16 Hart. ngkpt=3*16
> Phonon frequencies in cm-1 :
> - 7.573314E+01 7.699138E+01 7.720520E+01 7.450543E+02 7.451827E+02
> - 7.452047E+02
>
> ecut=16 Hart. ngkpt=3*18
> Phonon frequencies in cm-1 :
> - 7.572324E+01 7.699129E+01 7.720675E+01 7.448678E+02 7.452402E+02
> - 7.453041E+02
>
> ecut=18 Hart. ngkpt=3*16
> Phonon frequencies in cm-1 :
> - 7.630890E+01 7.747308E+01 7.767107E+01 7.450455E+02 7.451757E+02
> - 7.451981E+02
>
> All accoustic freq. are quite larger than zero.
> What is the possible reasons?
> Could you give some information?
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Geunsik.
>
>
>
- accoustic frequency for a metal, Lee Geunsik, 07/13/2004
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic frequency for a metal, verstraete, 07/13/2004
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic frequency for a metal, Xavier Gonze, 07/13/2004
- Re: [abinit-forum] accoustic frequency for a metal, Thomas Maxisch, 07/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.