forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Marcel Mohr <marcel@physik.tu-berlin.de>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:08:51 +0100 (CET)
Dear Abinit users
I want to relax my structure regarding cell size. To do so I need to set a non-zero ecutsm.
When I enter the obtained relaxed coordinates in RF calculations
I use ecutsm=0 (I think the manual says I have to use it for phonon calculations).
Then stress occurs, about 4 magnitudes more on the level of 50 GPa. I guess that introduces some error on the results.
Any suggestions?
Otherwise I have to do some a,c over energy curves to get the relaxed coordinates.
Kind Regards
Marcel Mohr
- NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, geoffrey . stenuit, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Guillaume Dumont, 02/02/2007
- ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Marcel Mohr, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Marcel Mohr, 02/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Xavier Gonze, 02/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Marcel Mohr, 02/05/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 02/02/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Geoffrey Stenuit, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Francois Bottin, 02/02/2007
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Geoffrey Stenuit, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Francois Bottin, 02/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.