forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:14:29 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F48t4X5YhlAtfrtJ6HwZAVhTueMiv8LBqRIbQ/wBHR+pwwySv2VxYZddQtVGL7i+IA1BKn5Lm6Hiq6c4sTEBOv2M6uBL/zO7DQIRgXxcOhrQ2qAOen3o1IHrHfUdUkEpGvqQP60k2/s73F9Ihc38GaVWsB9BgPu1RAmmrS3GGio=
Hi,
There could be many reasons for your problem. Would you mind sending
both of your input ( and eventually output) files ?
One of the simple reasons (not saying that it can't be something else)
for your problem could be that your computations are not converged
with respect to 1) Ecut 2) kpt 3) SCF cycles. Have you carefully
checked all this ?
regards
PMA
On 2/2/07, Marcel Mohr <marcel@physik.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
Dear Abinit users
I want to relax my structure regarding cell size. To do so I need to set a
non-zero ecutsm.
When I enter the obtained relaxed coordinates in RF calculations
I use ecutsm=0 (I think the manual says I have to use it for phonon
calculations).
Then stress occurs, about 4 magnitudes more on the level of 50 GPa. I
guess that introduces some error on the results.
Any suggestions?
Otherwise I have to do some a,c over energy curves to get the relaxed
coordinates.
Kind Regards
Marcel Mohr
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, geoffrey . stenuit, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Guillaume Dumont, 02/02/2007
- ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Marcel Mohr, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Marcel Mohr, 02/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Xavier Gonze, 02/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Marcel Mohr, 02/05/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecutsm\=0 in relax and RF calculations, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 02/02/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Geoffrey Stenuit, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Francois Bottin, 02/02/2007
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Geoffrey Stenuit, 02/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] NaN with npband 2 and when nband > VB+2, Francois Bottin, 02/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.