forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
[abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT
Chronological Thread
- From: "张�s" <zhangting1980323@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:08:39 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=shAJ87dyQ1FctvgizyUEiMjNw/FXPuLewlIhiRpaBnnKUmM3mLClBoqDy3vmL20IGB gN0uyGaCU2D0nTBocJnhPOS/J9wTECnAJU16iVX2g7n0JMVdNU5Vqm55ra+QmmmSI3UU mcce3II1iASlJ+gUqLyd9saNA6yEiHOzQzv9Q=
Dear All:
I'm calculating the elph matrix with ABINIT code. I find that the calculated elph matrix elements change their sign via k-point, and I feel this quite strange. For example, I'm calculating a testing system which is a carbon atom chain. The system has two carbon atoms in an unit cell, 8 bands, and the fermi level is located between iband = 4 and iband =5. I expect the elph coupling between these two bands near fermi k-point(k = -0.5 , k=0.5) is important. So with phonon's q =0, I calculated the elph matrix g(k,k+q,ib1,ib2). The results seems strange because the elph matrix element change their sign via k-point, see below:
q =0, branch =6 (the LO mode, which should be the strongest el-ph coupling mode in C2 chain)
ib1=4,ib2=5,
k=-0.475, gkk(pert=atom1, z-direction)=-2.432264e-002 +i*8.642045e-001, gkk(pert=atom2,z-direction)=2.432269e-002 +i*-8.642045e-001
k=-0.425, gkk(pert=atom1, z-direction)=2.397082e-002 +i*-8.564656e-001, gkk(pert=atom2,z-direction)=-2.397087e-002 +i*8.564656e-001
k=-0.375, gkk(pert=atom1, z-direction)=-2.323420e-002 +i*8.402542e-001, gkk(pert=atom2,z-direction)=2.323425e-002 +i*-8.402542e-001
k=-0.325, gkk(pert=atom1, z-direction)=-2.204158e-002 +i*8.139450e-001, gkk(pert=atom2,z-direction)=2.204164e-002 +i*-8.139450e-001
k=-0.275, gkk(pert=atom1, z-direction)=2.027373e-002 +i*-7.746554e-001, gkk(pert=atom2,z-direction)=-2.027378e-002 +i*7.746554e-001
We can see that from k= -0.475 --> k= -0.425, the gkk change sign. Also I can not find any rule in the sign change. Why these gkk element change sign via k-points? And is this result correct? Thanks! My input file is attached.
Regards
Zhang Ting
Peking Univ.
Jun, 29th. 2008
Attachment:
C2.in
Description: Binary data
- [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT, 张�s, 06/29/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.