forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
Re: [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT
Chronological Thread
- From: "张�s" <zhangting1980323@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:45:50 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=RuDNyA4gbwKjkvo2Pwx189L/kWyTxLH+NPXpqPSW4Uw7OnLPrqU3/1+SyT4FVnGh9J nkphOekdOi348W88EMqytQAf4I9GW7P/6BepFLwIpSjcE38fLw8/NFAOYDSIu6U1g777 QjFVChxWpcfd6gxip2LfDBNP9G+FVpYEVsN+c=
Dear Matthieu:
Thank you for your kindly reply. My gkk element value are read directly from gkk file, which are extracted from 1WF files with mrggkk code. So the gkk elements I mentioned are directly from abinis.
So you mean that the |gkk|^2 is physical meaningful. I see. I'll read paper you mentioned, And can you show me some paper that can prove the gkk should be positive in stable systems? Thanks
Regards
Zhang Ting
Peking Univ
June 30th, 2008
2008/6/29 <mjv500@york.ac.uk>:
Hello,
it sounds like you are only calculating the q=0 phonons. I don't know where you are extracting the gkk from, but you normally need many more phonon qpoints. The anaddb code will interpolate for q which are not in your default set. If you have too few qpoints you can get bad interpolation and the phonon linewidth can go negative artificially. Check if any of your phonons have gone soft (w<0) - this could also mess up the gkk and linewidths.
On a more general note, the gkk matrix elements don't absolutely need to have a particular sign; the observable quantity is the linewidth, which is related to the gkk squared. There are, however, hand waving arguments for the gkk being positive in stable systems.
Concerning the wires, most monoatomic straight wires are unstable wrt deformation into a zigag (see Phys. Rev. B 74 , 153408 (2006) and the references to Batra and others therein), so this could be the unstable mode you are seeing in a 2 atom unit cell.
Matthieu
- [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT, 张�s, 06/29/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT, mjv500, 06/29/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT, 张�s, 06/29/2008
- Re: [abinit-forum] Question about plus-minus sign of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements calculated by ABINIT, mjv500, 06/29/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.