forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Bernard Amadon <bernard.amadon@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal
- Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:08:16 +0200
Dear Vincent,
With iscf=17 (the default value of iscf), ETOT
is equal to the so-called "double counting" expression of the energy
written "Etotal (DC)" in the .out file (you could check it in your .out file).
Moreover, Etotal and Etotal (DC) (both written in the .out file)
are expected to agree if
your calculation is well converged.
In your case, your convergence criterion
is weak (toldfe 1.d-05) so Etotal and Etotal (DC)
are not equal. You could
increase you convergence criterion to check this.
Best regards
Bernard
Vincent Chevrier a écrit :
Hi,
I am wondering what the difference is between Etotal and etotal for PAW
calcs. I can't remember ever seeing a difference stated on the ABINIT
website. I'm especially interested in knowing how tphysel affects this
difference.
I completed two runs with the same structure the only difference being
tphysel=0 and tphysel=0.00213.
>From the .out file:
For tphysel=0:
Kinetic energy = 1.72081044902126E+01
Hartree energy = 1.17823500013938E+01
XC energy = -3.59810665254476E+01
Ewald energy = -1.07436906857906E+02
PspCore energy = 8.93535605840166E+00
Loc. psp. energy= -4.47984809673791E+01
Spherical terms = -7.44950150296981E+01
>>>>> Internal E= -2.24785658830422E+02
-kT*entropy = 2.10993387856660E-04
>>>>>>>>> Etotal= -2.24785447837035E+02
and
etotal -2.2478510911E+02
For tphysel=0.002131
Kinetic energy = 1.72075689848333E+01
Hartree energy = 1.17845516746048E+01
XC energy = -3.59818457081452E+01
Ewald energy = -1.07436906857906E+02
PspCore energy = 8.93535605840166E+00
Loc. psp. energy= -4.48011025224259E+01
Spherical terms = -7.44958705044103E+01
>>>>> Internal E= -2.24788248875047E+02
-kT*entropy = 2.50366407550064E-03
>>>>>>>>> Etotal= -2.24785745210972E+02
and
etotal -2.2478486425E+02
below is the input file. Can anybody help me understand:
1 - the cause of the difference between Etotal and etotal
2 - the effect of tphysel on the difference between Etotal and etotal
Thanks
Vincent
Input file:
ndtset 2
tphysel1 0.002131
tphysel2 0.0
occopt 4
tsmear 0.01
pawecutdg 15
ecut 15
kptopt 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5
kptrlatt 6 0 0
0 3 0
0 0 10
nstep 50
toldfe 1.0d-5
ntypat 2
znucl 3 14
natom 34
typat 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1
1 2
acell 1.5065427965E+01 2.8615352526E+01 8.4083802112E+00 Bohr
rprim 1.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
xred 7.4996953092E-13 5.0000000000E-01 0.0000000000E+00
9.6480532055E-02 1.9420479791E-01 0.0000000000E+00
2.7080350417E-01 3.4610078252E-01 0.0000000000E+00
1.5292044305E-01 2.5787557735E-02 0.0000000000E+00
4.1748605305E-01 1.6031572532E-01 0.0000000000E+00
2.5955975937E-01 9.5181187368E-02 5.0000000000E-01
4.0978302750E-01 2.5635768786E-01 5.0000000000E-01
9.6925526499E-02 3.9393640703E-01 5.0000000000E-01
4.2837868374E-01 4.3177429281E-01 5.0000000000E-01
9.0351946795E-01 8.0579520209E-01 0.0000000000E+00
7.2919649583E-01 6.5389921748E-01 0.0000000000E+00
8.4707955695E-01 9.7421244227E-01 0.0000000000E+00
5.8251394695E-01 8.3968427468E-01 0.0000000000E+00
7.4044024063E-01 9.0481881263E-01 5.0000000000E-01
5.9021697250E-01 7.4364231214E-01 5.0000000000E-01
9.0307447350E-01 6.0606359297E-01 5.0000000000E-01
5.7162131627E-01 5.6822570719E-01 5.0000000000E-01
5.0000000000E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00
4.0351946795E-01 6.9420479791E-01 0.0000000000E+00
2.2919649583E-01 8.4610078252E-01 0.0000000000E+00
3.4707955695E-01 5.2578755773E-01 0.0000000000E+00
8.2513946947E-02 6.6031572532E-01 0.0000000000E+00
2.4044024063E-01 5.9518118737E-01 5.0000000000E-01
9.0216972503E-02 7.5635768786E-01 5.0000000000E-01
4.0307447350E-01 8.9393640703E-01 5.0000000000E-01
7.1621316266E-02 9.3177429281E-01 5.0000000000E-01
5.9648053206E-01 3.0579520209E-01 0.0000000000E+00
7.7080350417E-01 1.5389921748E-01 0.0000000000E+00
6.5292044305E-01 4.7421244227E-01 0.0000000000E+00
9.1748605305E-01 3.3968427468E-01 0.0000000000E+00
7.5955975937E-01 4.0481881263E-01 5.0000000000E-01
9.0978302750E-01 2.4364231214E-01 5.0000000000E-01
5.9692552650E-01 1.0606359297E-01 5.0000000000E-01
9.2837868374E-01 6.8225707188E-02 5.0000000000E-01
- [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Bernard Amadon, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/04/2009
- [abinit-forum] problem with optic, pablo picasso, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Bernard Amadon, 09/03/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.