forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: pablo picasso <job_udem@hotmail.com>
- To: forum <forum@abinit.org>
- Subject: [abinit-forum] problem with optic
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:52:27 -0400
- Importance: Normal
hi, I try to perform the tutorial of optic http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v5.8/tutorial/lesson_optic.html The input file can be found at: ~abinit/tests/tutorespfn/Input/toptic_1.in and I run it with 5.8 . It have 6 dataset, however it can't perform the 4th because of this (toptic_1.log, just after reading the WFK of the 3rd dataset): hdr_check: Wavefunction file is OK for direct restart of calculation ================================================================================ wfsinp: inside loop, init ikpt0,isppol0= 1 1 rwwf: ERROR - Reading option of rwwf. Trying to read a RF wf record of a wf file, unit= 3 gave iostat= 1. Your file is likely not correct. Action: check your input wf file. leave_new : decision taken to exit ... Does anyone know what this error means? thx a lot JB input files: =================================================== #Prepare the computation of linear and non-linear optic properties #of GaAs crystal : ground-state with few bands, #then non-SCF with a larger number of bands, then ddk for different directions #Note that the k point sampling shoud be finer for significant results. The cut-off energy is also too low. ndtset 6 #First dataset : SC run with kpoints in the IBZ iscf1 3 nband1 4 nstep1 25 kptopt1 1 nbdbuf1 0 prtden1 1 getden1 0 getwfk1 0 ! Usual file handling data #Second dataset : NSC run with large number of bands, and points in the IBZ iscf2 -2 nband2 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and real part of linear optics nstep2 25 kptopt2 1 getwfk2 1 getden2 1 ! Usual file handling data #Third dataset : NSC run with large number of bands, and points in the the full BZ iscf3 -2 nband3 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and real part of linear optics nstep3 25 kptopt3 3 getwfk3 2 getden3 1 ! Usual file handling data #Fourth dataset : ddk response function along axis 1 iscf4 -3 nband4 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and real part of linear optics nstep4 1 nline4 0 kptopt4 3 nqpt4 1 qpt4 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 rfdir4 1 0 0 rfelfd4 2 getwfk4 3 #Fifth dataset : ddk response function along axis 2 iscf5 -3 nband5 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and real part of linear optics nstep5 1 nline5 0 kptopt5 3 nqpt5 1 qpt5 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 rfdir5 0 1 0 rfelfd5 2 getwfk5 3 #Sixth dataset : ddk response function along axis 3 iscf6 -3 nband6 20 ! This number of bands might be too low for non-linear optics and real part of linear optics nstep6 1 nline6 0 kptopt6 3 nqpt6 1 qpt6 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 rfdir6 0 0 1 rfelfd6 2 getwfk6 3 #Data common to all datasets nshiftk 4 shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 ngkpt 4 4 4 ! This is much too low : should be at least 24x24x24 acell 3*10.60 amu 69.72 74.9216 diemac 10.0 ecut 2.00 ! This is also too low iscf 3 ixc 3 natom 2 nbdbuf 2 ntypat 2 rprim 0 .5 .5 .5 0 .5 .5 .5 0 xred 3*0.00d0 3*0.25d0 tnons 72*0.0 typat 1 2 tolwfr 1.e-20 znucl 31 33 New! Open Hotmail faster on the new MSN homepage! New! Hotmail sign-in on the MSN homepage. |
- [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Bernard Amadon, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/04/2009
- [abinit-forum] problem with optic, pablo picasso, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/04/2009
- REĀ : [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Marc.TORRENT, 09/06/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/06/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/03/2009
- [abinit-forum] problem with optic, Jason Beaudin, 09/08/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Bernard Amadon, 09/03/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.