forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: TORRENT Marc <marc.torrent@cea.fr>
 - To: forum@abinit.org
 - Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal
 - Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:12:03 +0200
 - Organization: CEA-DAM
 
| 
Dear Vincent, Some explanations (but not all). etotal is used to converge the scf cycle and contains an entropy energy computed with tsmear. It is obtained by direct scheme if iscf<10, by double-counting scheme if iscf>=10: iscf=7 : etotal=e_intern - tsmear*entropy iscf=17: etotal=eDC_intern - tsmear*entropy Etotal (EtotalDC) is just printed at the end of the SCF cycle and recomputed at that level. It uses tphysel if not zero, else tsmear: If tphysel<>0: Etotal=e_intern - tphysel*entropy EtotalDC=eDC_intern - tphysel*entropy If tphysel=0: Etotal=e_intern - tsmear*entropy EtotalDC=eDC_intern - tsmear*entropy So, it explains the differences between etotal and Etotal. Why is it implemented like this: I don't know. The developer who introduced tphysel should be able to explain that. Concerning the difference between Etotal and EtotalDC when tphysel<>0... it sounds strange. But I cannot explore further if I'm not sure of the convergence of your SCF cycle. toldfe is not the right criterium. you should use tolvrs and put it to a very low value (i.e 1.d-15 or lower). Regards, Marc Etotal and Etotal Vincent Chevrier a écrit : 60945.142.68.35.223.1251977332.squirrel@dahn.phys.dal.ca" type="cite">  | 
- [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Bernard Amadon, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/04/2009
 - [abinit-forum] problem with optic, pablo picasso, 09/04/2009
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/04/2009
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/04/2009
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/04/2009
 - REĀ : [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Marc.TORRENT, 09/06/2009
 
 
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/04/2009
 
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
 
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, matthieu verstraete, 09/03/2009
 
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, TORRENT Marc, 09/03/2009
 
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Vincent Chevrier, 09/03/2009
 
 - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal, Bernard Amadon, 09/03/2009
 
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.