Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Vincent Chevrier <vincent.chevrier@dahn.phys.dal.ca>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Etotal versus etotal
  • Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:29:55 -0300 (ADT)
  • Importance: Normal

Hi Marc and Matthieu,

I am now somewhat confused. When using tphysel, which one is correct,
etotal or Etotal?

Contrary to Matthieu's last comment, I thought it was Etotal which was
correct as it was stable with tsmear as shown in the graph I attached in
the last post and as mentioned by Marc. Can anyone confirm this?

Thanks
Vincent

>
>> I further
>> note that the routine which is called (etotfor or prtene) changes due
>> to PAW and a number of other criteria, so it may be that the correct
>> number in your case was etotal, and Etotal was false (using tsmear
>> instead of tphysel).
>>
>>
> No no, I checked that...
> You just have to change eent or energies%entropy and this will be OK.
>
> Marc
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page