forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: david.hendry@mandmd.com.au
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:00:57 +0200
Dear Abinitors,
I'm interested in the static dielectric constant of ceramics/insulators. I
notice the latest release notes of Abinit: "B.10 Born effective charges and
dielectric tensor calculations can now be computed in a finite electric
field."
Does this feature or any other new feature (from 5.3.4) allow a more
efficient/accurate calculation of the static dielectric properties?
Sincerely,
David.
- 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, david . hendry, 09/05/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Xinjie Wang, 09/05/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Nicola Marzari, 09/05/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Xinjie Wang, 09/05/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Philippe Ghosez, 09/05/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, David Hendry, 09/06/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Philippe Ghosez, 09/06/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Xavier Gonze, 09/06/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Philippe Ghosez, 09/06/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, David Hendry, 09/06/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Nicola Marzari, 09/05/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] 5.4.3 - better at static dielectric constant?, Xinjie Wang, 09/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.