forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Re: segmentation fault

From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Re: segmentation fault
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:35:00 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=EeJvRLpYht82HVZ800Fh0pN91UQQ+dBsvG34Q/iMWhcblEduG8UeZdVUBGXGTNwzfCX8udErpu9iFWIjuN/Qvk90cn4jO32vfye5CiiKKH2q9C+iMsEMu1LoKTwwC9auR/8HsysuHehcbuT7Iibh2ip+zjgNyn5YVRahdWcZuos=

Hello,

I fear it will be difficult to help you then. Did you get the same problem with other compilation options ? Especially the default options and the debugging options ? If so you may try to use a debugger.
Also did you try other compilers ?
I'm still thinking that you are witness of a compiler bug ... But in the other case having a binary with debugging symbols will be quite helpful.

An other point: I notice that you do not specify the k-point you use. Usually people considering molecular systems keep with the Gamma point. Is there any reasons for considering 0.5 0.5 0.5 instead ?

Regards

PMA

On Nov 22, 2007 11:49 AM, <guillermo.roman@uam.es> wrote:

Hi,
I am compiling with ifort. The only change I do it is in the config.mk: intead of -static-libcxa I put -static, in order to make a completely static binary.
My compilation passes the test without problems.
Thanks

Guillermo

--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade

segmentation fault, guillermo . roman, 11/21/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] segmentation fault, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 11/21/2007
  - Re: [abinit-forum] segmentation fault, Guillermo Román, 11/22/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: segmentation fault, guillermo . roman, 11/22/2007
  - Re: [abinit-forum] Re: segmentation fault, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 11/22/2007
    - Re: [abinit-forum] Re: segmentation fault, john Bob, 11/22/2007