forum@abinit.org
Subject:
The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Guillermo Román <guillermo.roman@uam.es>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] segmentation fault
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:52:40 +0100
Hi, I am compiling with ifort. The only change I do it is in the config.mk: intead of -static-libcxa I put -static, in order to make a completely static binary. My compilation passes the test without problems. Thanks
Guillermo
On 21/11/2007, at 15:13, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote: Hi,
Your input file looks correct. After testing it with Abinit 5.3.4 on a x86 I can only tell that Abinit should handle it without problem. I wonder if the segfault you witness can be related to any compilation bug: which compiler are you using and do the resulting Abinit binaries pass the self test ? I would be quite surprised if they do.
Also, for such a system you might be interested in using the BigDFT (wavelet) part of Abinit.
Best regards
PMA
On Nov 21, 2007 1:54 PM, < guillermo.roman@uam.es> wrote: I am new in abinit. I am trying to calculate the Total Energies. I have to use 25 Hartrees and a 20 Ang cubic cell. I get a "segmentation fault just before having calculated the first Etotal. I though it was a problem of memory, so I reduce the parameters (ecut, acell) and I get a positive result. However, using these less demanding parameters I do a monitoring of the memory cost. I am runing in a Intel Xeon 64 dual core with 4Gb of memory. With 12.5 Ha and 40 bohr cubic cell I get a "segmentation fault" while abinit print: P This job should need less than 532.428 Mbytes of memory. Rough estimation (10% accuracy) of disk space for files : WF disk file : 34.002 Mbytes ; DEN or POT disk file : 16.002 Mbytes.
So, it seems that it is not a memory problem at all.
I am running a sequencial 5.4.4 version (I have tried 5.3 too) the only WARNING I receive is related with low ecut I am using: mkdenpos : WARNING - Density went < 0 at 36827 points and was set to 1.00E-14. Lowest was -0.90E-05. Likely due to too low boxcut or too low ecut for pseudopotential core charge.
I almost sure is a detail or something that it's missing in th input file
-------------------------------------------------------------- Here is easy the Input file:
# C6H6 molecule in a big box # #Definition of the unit cell acell 40.0 40.0 40.0
#Definition of the atom ntypat 2 znucl 1 6 natom 24 typat 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 xangst -2.5253 0.0064 0.0005 -1.2742 2.1434 0.0006 1.2021 2.1407 0.0005 2.4309 -0.0086 0.0005 1.1848 -2.1480 0.0005 -1.2911 -2.1403 0.0005 -2.5253 0.0064 7.0005 -1.2742 2.1434 7.0006 1.2021 2.1407 7.0005 2.4309 -0.0086 7.0005 1.1848 -2.1480 7.0005 -1.2911 -2.1403 7.0005 -0.7367 1.2078 0.0005 0.6606 1.2074 0.0005 1.3519 -0.0065 0.0005 0.6470 -1.2126 0.0005 -0.7500 -1.2068 0.0005 -1.4463 0.0044 0.0005 -0.7367 1.2078 7.0005 0.6606 1.2074 7.0005 1.3519 -0.0065 7.0005 0.6470 -1.2126 7.0005 -0.7500 -1.2068 7.0005 -1.4463 0.0044 7.0005
#Ionic Relaxation #ionmov 4 #ionic relaxation by Cradient Conjugated optcell 0 #optimize the cell shape and dimensions #ntime 50 #tolmxf 5.0d-5 #hartree/Bohr
#SFC options ixc 11 #PBE iscf 17 #Pulay scheme for mixing SFC history (tried with 5 also) #npulayit 3 #number of pulay iprcel 0 #SFC precondition scheme Default nsppol 1 #number of spin polarization
#Definition of the SCF procedure nstep 30 # SCF cycles toldfe 1.0d-6 diemac 2.0
#Definition of the planewave basis set ecut 25.0 Ry
#Definition of the k-point grid nkpt 1 # Only one k point is needed for isolated system,
#Debugging options prtvol 1 istatr 5
-- Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.