forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:20:31 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ObjuYmCJpwMmJFXR65K0J+pAliQ6GCPcGPyMbzm4OG/bH79yLmBgfeqJTZbg4Hgm1rkbd0chEovLEaT0iEkgVqIQSWkWEsuFXvi0DCWvELorJOlpnljIaE2Ic5jpUpktFNJaMQJMPaI97/I3kgXR6DbHpSXIRDpTo4aMndxj8aE=
If your atoms are at special position I guess that there are forces on
them? Then your lattice shall not be stable, shall it? And I guess it
is somehow natural to find some negative phonon frequency?
Note that I'm not at all an expert so may be someone can give you some
more accurate comments. I can mistake or also simply misunderstand
what your saying. But your result seems fine from what I understand.
regards
PMA
On 6/8/06, javier.torres@unito.it <javier.torres@unito.it> wrote:
Dear Abinit Users
I performed a response function calculation in order to get the phonons at
gamma point of AgB2... For this I used the optimized gometry of my system,
performed with ionmov 2 and optcell 2 as you can see in the attached files,
the obtained lattice parameters correspond to a stress tensor with components
smaller than 10^-8, the atomic coordinates were not optimized because the
atoms are special positions...
The result of the phonon calculation with this geometry is a set of freqs
with very negative values of about -46 cm^-1 ... How can I get the adequate
geometry of my system to get the true frequencies???
Kind regards
F. T.
OPT...
# Hexagonal Primitive (P6/mmm) AgB2 GS SHIFTK 0 0 0
# Geometric block
spgroup 191
acell 5.4424112657 5.4424112657 6.6707332527 #Experimental Values Lal
angdeg 90 90 120
ntypat 2
znucl 47 5
natom 3
typat 1 2 2
xred
0.0 0.0 0.0
1/3 2/3 1/2
2/3 1/3 1/2
#
# OPTCELL
#
ionmov 2
optcell 2 #try opcell 2 too!!!
tolmxf 1.0d-5
ntime 50
dilatmx 1.2
strfact 10
#
# Methods and Parameters
#
intxc 0 #better for fft changed disable for RF calc
occopt 7 #added for metalic occupation Gaussian smearing
tsmear 0.01 #convergence
brav 4 #added for hexagonal lattice
ixc 1
ecut 30.0
ecutsm 0.5
ngkpt 10 10 10 #16x16x16 exceeds the limit of memory allocation with
kopt=2
frzfermi 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.0
#
# SCF defined in each dataset
#
nstep 1000
#
# DS_1 gs and density calculation
#
iscf 3
kptopt 1
kptgen 1
toldfe 1.0d-12 #important for freqcalc
#irdwfk 1
Phon...
# Hexagonal Primitive (P6/mmm) AgB2 GS SHIFTK 0 0 0
ndtset 2
# Geometric block
spgroup 191
acell 5.6504357844 5.6504357843 7.5478571140
angdeg 90 90 120
ntypat 2
znucl 47 5
natom 3
typat 1 2 2
xred
0.0 0.0 0.0
1/3 2/3 1/2
2/3 1/3 1/2
#
# Methods and Parameters
#
intxc 0 #better for fft changed disable for RF calc
occopt 7 #added for metalic occupation Gaussian smearing
tsmear 0.01 #convergence
brav 4 #added for hexagonal lattice
ixc 1
ecut 43.0
ecutsm 0.5
ngkpt 10 10 10 #16x16x16 exceeds the limit of memory allocation with
kopt=2
#frzfermi 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.0
#
# SCF defined in each dataset
#
nstep 1000
#
# DS_1 gs and density calculation
#
iscf1 3
kptopt1 1
kptgen1 1
tolwfr1 1.0d-20 #important for freqcalc
#irdwfk1 1
#
# DS_2 whole phonon
#
rfphon2 1 # Will consider phonon-type perturbation
rfatpol2 1 3 # Only the first atom is displaced
rfdir2 1 1 1 # Along the first reduced coordinate axis
nqpt2 1 # One wavevector is to be considered
qpt2 0 0 0 # This wavevector is q=0 (Gamma)
kptopt2 2 # Automatic generation of k points, taking
# into account the time-reversal symmetry only
tolvrs2 1.0d-10 # SCF stopping criterion
iscf2 3 # Self-consistent calculation, using algorithm 3
getwfk2 -1 # Read the ground-state wavefunctions
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, javier . torres, 06/08/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Katalin Gaal-Nagy, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Matthieu Verstraete, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Xavier Gonze, 06/13/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.