forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:37:49 +0200
Dear Javier,
It might be that you do not include enough bands (input variable nband). This number is chosen automatically
by ABINIT, but might not be enough for your calculation (phonons in a metal). Indeed, it has been observed that
phonon frequencies are sensitive to the explicit treatment of bands that are higher than the Fermi energy,
and only very weakly populated. Such bands usually do not play a major role in the total energy,
but this might not be the case for the phonons.
Xavier
On 08 Jun 2006, at 19:40, javier.torres@unito.it wrote:
Dear Abinit Users
I performed a response function calculation in order to get the phonons at gamma point of AgB2... For this I used the optimized gometry of my system, performed with ionmov 2 and optcell 2 as you can see in the attached files, the obtained lattice parameters correspond to a stress tensor with components smaller than 10^-8, the atomic coordinates were not optimized because the atoms are special positions...
The result of the phonon calculation with this geometry is a set of freqs with very negative values of about -46 cm^-1 ... How can I get the adequate geometry of my system to get the true frequencies???
Kind regards
F. T.
OPT...
# Hexagonal Primitive (P6/mmm) AgB2 GS SHIFTK 0 0 0
# Geometric block
spgroup 191
acell 5.4424112657 5.4424112657 6.6707332527 #Experimental Values Lal
angdeg 90 90 120
ntypat 2
znucl 47 5
natom 3
typat 1 2 2
xred
0.0 0.0 0.0
1/3 2/3 1/2
2/3 1/3 1/2
#
# OPTCELL
#
ionmov 2
optcell 2 #try opcell 2 too!!!
tolmxf 1.0d-5
ntime 50
dilatmx 1.2
strfact 10
#
# Methods and Parameters
#
intxc 0 #better for fft changed disable for RF calc
occopt 7 #added for metalic occupation Gaussian smearing
tsmear 0.01 #convergence
brav 4 #added for hexagonal lattice
ixc 1
ecut 30.0
ecutsm 0.5
ngkpt 10 10 10 #16x16x16 exceeds the limit of memory allocation with kopt=2
frzfermi 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.0
#
# SCF defined in each dataset
#
nstep 1000
#
# DS_1 gs and density calculation
#
iscf 3
kptopt 1
kptgen 1
toldfe 1.0d-12 #important for freqcalc
#irdwfk 1
Phon...
# Hexagonal Primitive (P6/mmm) AgB2 GS SHIFTK 0 0 0
ndtset 2
# Geometric block
spgroup 191
acell 5.6504357844 5.6504357843 7.5478571140
angdeg 90 90 120
ntypat 2
znucl 47 5
natom 3
typat 1 2 2
xred
0.0 0.0 0.0
1/3 2/3 1/2
2/3 1/3 1/2
#
# Methods and Parameters
#
intxc 0 #better for fft changed disable for RF calc
occopt 7 #added for metalic occupation Gaussian smearing
tsmear 0.01 #convergence
brav 4 #added for hexagonal lattice
ixc 1
ecut 43.0
ecutsm 0.5
ngkpt 10 10 10 #16x16x16 exceeds the limit of memory allocation with kopt=2
#frzfermi 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.0
#
# SCF defined in each dataset
#
nstep 1000
#
# DS_1 gs and density calculation
#
iscf1 3
kptopt1 1
kptgen1 1
tolwfr1 1.0d-20 #important for freqcalc
#irdwfk1 1
#
# DS_2 whole phonon
#
rfphon2 1 # Will consider phonon-type perturbation
rfatpol2 1 3 # Only the first atom is displaced
rfdir2 1 1 1 # Along the first reduced coordinate axis
nqpt2 1 # One wavevector is to be considered
qpt2 0 0 0 # This wavevector is q=0 (Gamma)
kptopt2 2 # Automatic generation of k points, taking
# into account the time-reversal symmetry only
tolvrs2 1.0d-10 # SCF stopping criterion
iscf2 3 # Self-consistent calculation, using algorithm 3
getwfk2 -1 # Read the ground-state wavefunctions
- Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, javier . torres, 06/08/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Katalin Gaal-Nagy, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Matthieu Verstraete, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Xavier Gonze, 06/13/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.