Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Javier Torres <javier.torres@unito.it>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????
  • Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:33:56 +0200

Dear Anglade

Thank you for the interest...

When I say special positions for the atoms I mean that they can not be relaxed during the optimization, their fractional coordinates are fixed and the interatomic distance changes when they are scaled with the new lattice parameters... As result of that the forces become smaller too as I could see in the output of the optimization...

cartesian coordinates (angstrom) at end:
1 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
2 0.00000000000000 1.72195994003625 2.00945363615211
3 1.49126105237052 0.86097997001812 2.00945363615211

cartesian forces (hartree/bohr) at end: 1 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
2 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
3 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
frms,max,avg= 5.3532090E-31 9.8765995E-31 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 h/b

cartesian forces (eV/Angstrom) at end:
1 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
2 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
3 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
frms,max,avg= 2.7527306E-29 5.0787513E-29 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 e/A

What else can produce wrong freqs????

Kind regards----

FT



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page