forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Katalin Gaal-Nagy <katalin.gaal-nagy@physik.uni-regensburg.de>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
Dear Javier,
imaginary frequencies can have various reasons (I am sorry, I didn't check your input files because of a lack of time):
- numerical instability (not converged enough with respect to k, ecut,
etc)
- the structure is instable, meaninig:
There exist a structure in the same cell, maybe with less symmetry,
which has a lower energy as the same volume and is therefor more stable.
What happens with your cell if you don't put any symmetry?
Maybe it helps ...
Katalin
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Javier Torres wrote:
Dear Anglade
Thank you for the interest...
When I say special positions for the atoms I mean that they can not be relaxed during the optimization, their fractional coordinates are fixed and the interatomic distance changes when they are scaled with the new lattice parameters... As result of that the forces become smaller too as I could see in the output of the optimization...
cartesian coordinates (angstrom) at end:
1 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
2 0.00000000000000 1.72195994003625 2.00945363615211
3 1.49126105237052 0.86097997001812 2.00945363615211
cartesian forces (hartree/bohr) at end: 1 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
2 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
3 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
frms,max,avg= 5.3532090E-31 9.8765995E-31 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 h/b
cartesian forces (eV/Angstrom) at end:
1 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
2 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
3 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
frms,max,avg= 2.7527306E-29 5.0787513E-29 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 e/A
What else can produce wrong freqs????
Kind regards----
FT
- Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, javier . torres, 06/08/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Katalin Gaal-Nagy, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Matthieu Verstraete, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Xavier Gonze, 06/13/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.