forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Vincenzo Fiorentini <vincenzo.fiorentini@dsf.unica.it>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:33:36 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=SXO8gvZ8+6HUNrtNJevbnN4Q1Bru69gEySZ1SvN/XRaBZHmyVZq9vwcVXxcgqFZGcPGgLDd2LevozMZ4P5rFThfSU84Lct7qi56BdGtahsAfo0B/Y0q6JME2aEyvgtLjEqM64qELFCnTPiOEEf3SmfHt9DT7qvNi9qMkd2/OXYs=
p.s. : I meant 130i cm^-1, sorry.
On 9 Jun 2006, at 11:17 AM, Vincenzo Fiorentini wrote:
Yup, I'd check Matthieu's second option. If you study, say, cubic LaAlO3 in a cubic cell doubled along 111 you get a triplet at 130i at k=0 which is a backfolded Raman mode related to a rotational distortion turning LaAlO3 into rhombohedral. But if cubic symmetry is imposed, of course you'll never get there.
Vincenzo Fiorentini
On 9 Jun 2006, at 11:06 AM, Matthieu Verstraete wrote:
This could be
1) a spurious phonon frequency coming from the pseudopotential. This is the subject of several old posts. Please check the archive. If you increase the ecut it should get smaller (not the solution though - get a better psp).
2) a true instability. You should analyse the mode anaddb is attributing to the negative frequency. As Pierre-Matthieu said, the forces are zeroed by abinit due to symmetry, and one could imagine a phase transition which breaks the symmetry (hence impossible to relax to). Give the atoms a small displacement along the phonon mode (provided it does break symmetry), and relax with ionmov 2 and optcell 2, to see what happens.
Matthieu
--
================================================================
Dr. Matthieu Verstraete mailto:mjv500@york.ac.uk
Dept. of Physics, University of York, tel: +44 1904 43 22 08
Heslington, YO10 5DD York, United Kingdom fax: +44 1904 43 22 14
- Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, javier . torres, 06/08/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Katalin Gaal-Nagy, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Matthieu Verstraete, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Vincenzo Fiorentini, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Javier Torres, 06/09/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Xavier Gonze, 06/13/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] Why big negative phonons at Gamma Point????, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.