forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Anurag Chaudhry <anuragchaudhry@yahoo.co.uk>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: [abinit-forum] GW calculations
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:49:32 +0000 (GMT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AIQSgVuTbcMWZ60V8t1/yimHJSQFYwaCAySlBUHrWC/svs2gteeuebKi3RS6ktxRzeyVNx4+0ycggrMmcr/PFXNiMh6o7LwnNfdja16w0bir+TmTOhWiowAD3YEWwNAaPKhqx3wuXnG80qy7usoHG/NbD1rdsPB/dxSbzPSYhus=;
Hi,
I am new to GW calculations though I have used ABINIT earlier. I saw the tutorial on GW approximation and have few questions.
If I understand correctly, then it is only possible to run a GW calculation for a single k-point. For example, GW calculations for Silicon in the tutorial are shown for Gamma point. Since the bandgap of Si is ~1.2eV (as I know) and it is an in-direct bandgap material is there a way to get this right ? The calculations at the end of tutorial show that the LDA gap at the Gamma point is ~253eV and GW correction adds about 0.63eV to this value.
I have to run calculations to determine bandgaps of certain Bi and Pb semiconductors with beyond LDA/GGA methods. This is how I started looking at GW but I am not sure if this is the right approach.
Any comments and suggestions are welcome.
regards,
Anurag
I am new to GW calculations though I have used ABINIT earlier. I saw the tutorial on GW approximation and have few questions.
If I understand correctly, then it is only possible to run a GW calculation for a single k-point. For example, GW calculations for Silicon in the tutorial are shown for Gamma point. Since the bandgap of Si is ~1.2eV (as I know) and it is an in-direct bandgap material is there a way to get this right ? The calculations at the end of tutorial show that the LDA gap at the Gamma point is ~253eV and GW correction adds about 0.63eV to this value.
I have to run calculations to determine bandgaps of certain Bi and Pb semiconductors with beyond LDA/GGA methods. This is how I started looking at GW but I am not sure if this is the right approach.
Any comments and suggestions are welcome.
regards,
Anurag
- [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Kris Andersen, 07/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Yann Pouillon, 07/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Matteo Giantomassi, 07/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Kris Andersen, 07/08/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Matteo Giantomassi, 07/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", matthieu verstraete, 07/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Yann Pouillon, 07/02/2009
- [abinit-forum] GW calculations, Anurag Chaudhry, 07/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculations, Fabien Bruneval, 07/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculations, Anurag Chaudhry, 07/06/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculations, Fabien Bruneval, 07/03/2009
- [abinit-forum] GW calculations, Anurag Chaudhry, 07/03/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Yann Pouillon, 07/02/2009
- Re: [abinit-forum] compilation problem for 5.7.4 and 5.8.3 on a Cray XD1: PGI "TERMINATED by signal 11", Yann Pouillon, 07/02/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.